The big yellow "you have new messages" banner was created for a reason. If you want my attention, edit this page. If I want your attention, I will edit your page. If I just want to reply out of politeness, I'll do it here and save interrupting whatever you're doing... if you're interested in what I said, watch this page and find out. If I'm keen to see your response, I will be watching your talk page, or wherever I suspect you might post it. But if you have something to say you think I need to read, the big yellow banner is kind of hard to miss...

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Terry Pratchett's The Colour of Magic edit

Terry Pratchett's The Colour of Magic has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 02:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

WP page deletions edit

Hi, Happy-melon! Happy New Year! I want to draw your attention to two related/similar pages you've had a hand in in the past, as well as your bot: this and this. As much as this is archiving historical info and discussions here, I felt that upon a closer investigation, this warrants no subpage archiving, as I saw and see no bloated discussion in-page to justify a bits-and-pieces page info archiving. I've merged the discussions in equality and trajectory/in arranging order of comment and suggestion additions into the former redirect. In good faith following established principles, I see and predict no reason to justify keeping the archived sub-pages in this era; could you please delete them from view? Thanks! Intrisit (talk) 13:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Merge" has been undone, fwiw. Primefac (talk) 19:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Happy First Edit Day! edit

Nomination for deletion of Template:Class mask/doc/custom edit

 Template:Class mask/doc/custom has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply