Finneganw
Topic Ban on Anna Anderson edit
I have reviewed the discussion at the Administrators Noticeboard. There is a clear consensus that your continued participation at Anna Anderson is unhelpful to this encyclopedia. You are therefore topic banned from both the Anna Anderson article, its talkpage and subpages. To be clear, this means that the person behind the Finneganw account may no longer edit any of those pages; you may not edit the pages using the Finneganw account, alternative accounts or unlogged in.
I am the bearer of bad news, I realize. I would, however, encourage you to continue editing Wikipedia, and contributing to other articles, since you clearly have much skill and knowledge to offer on various topics. Observing the topic ban and contributing in a collegial fashion to WP on other articles will be the best way of proving to all your commitment to the project, and will offer the best chance of the topic ban being lifted in the future. --Slp1 (talk) 01:36, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aussiebrisguy. Thank you. DrKiernan (talk) 10:09, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Blocked edit
I've reblocked this account (which now appears abandoned) due to your continued use of IPs and accounts in violation of Wikipedia policy to spam content about David Logan. Sarah 09:21, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 | Blocked as a sockpuppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Aussiebrisguy (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. |
The article Zdar Šorm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Seems to fail notability guidelines
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz679 14:18, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Bilbar Puppet Theatre edit
The article Bilbar Puppet Theatre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- I couldn't establish that they meet WP:NOTABILITY in any way
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 16:19, 11 April 2015 (UTC)