New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023 edit

Hello Eejit43,

 
New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

Tech News: 2024-17 edit

MediaWiki message delivery 20:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bad move edit

You chose a bad move target for Tiden (newspaper, Arendal) because Tiden (newspaper) is also a Norwegian newspaper. Geschichte (talk) 04:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Whoops, thank you! I have no clue how I missed that. I'll fix that later, and likely make a disambiguation. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 11:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Done! Tiden (Arendal newspaper) is the new location, and the other newspaper has been moved to Tiden (Christiania newspaper). Tiden (newspaper) is now a redirect to the Tiden disambiguation page. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 13:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Query regarding redirect-helper warning edit

Hi Eejit43 - and thanks for building redirect-helper :)

I just had a query regarding a warning it gave me -- I was trying to create a redirect from Ffransis (given name) to Ffransis with the rcat {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}} (before I realised that Ffransis G. Payne would be a better target, as the rest of the people listed at Ffransis had it as a surname), and redirect-helper warned me that [t]his page is a redirect to a surname list, but it is not tagged with a correct disambiguation categorization template. I was slightly confused by this - it might be that I'm missing something, but I'm not sure what redirect template the script wanted me to use here!

All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 09:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ah, now I'm wondering if redirect-helper wanted me to use {{R from incomplete disambiguation}} -- I suppose whether the disambiguation is unnecessary or incomplete depends on whether or not a name list is thought of as more of a stand-alone list or as a tool for disambiguation. ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 10:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
redirect-helper considers valid surname list templates to be {{R from ambiguous sort name}} and {{R from ambiguous term}}. I hadn't thought of {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}} when creating that check.
However, I think using both "R from ambiguous term" and "R from unnecessary disambiguation" would make sense, as the latter doesn't imply that the target is a disambiguation page (or in this case, a surname list).
Does that sound right to you? Thanks! :) ~ Eejit43 (talk) 11:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 25 April 2024 edit

afcrc-helper feauture request edit

Hi again - I was just wondering if it might be possible to add the feature to afcrc-helper to be able to accept/decline some requests in a section, and leave the others for another reviewer to respond to? The use case for this in my mind is in case a reviewer feels confident responding to some requests in a section, but perhaps isn't personally sure about accepting or declining the others - which another reviewer might feel more happy to do. (I just attempted to do this myself at WP:AFC/R, but afcrc-helper didn't like that I hadn't selected a response for all the requests made in a given section.)

(I promise I'm still planning on replying in the section I started above about redirect-helper, btw - I'm just very disorganised :P)

All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 12:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello!
This is actually something I had considered for a while. However, the implementation of this would be quite difficult, especially considering the script would need to account for actions other scripts take too. Parsing those sections could just lead to too many issues I think. At some point this might be something I look more into, but for the lack of usage I'm not sure it is necessarily worth it.
Probably best just to leave requests open if you are unsure about part of it. Sorry!! :) ~ Eejit43 (talk) 13:16, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
No problem - that makes sense. Since leaving this message, the potential complexity of implementing this started coming to my mind as well - so I can’t say I blame you for leaving it :) All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 14:07, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-18 edit

MediaWiki message delivery 03:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Courtesy notice of RM edit

Hi Eejit43 — I noticed that {{R from gender}} is listed in redirect-helper.json, so I just wanted to drop you a courtesy note that I’ve proposed that the template is moved to {{R from gendered term}}: Template talk:R from gender § Requested move 1 May 2024. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 09:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you!! I'll monitor the RM and update the script if the template is moved. :D ~ Eejit43 (talk) 12:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Elvis at The Scope edit

Here is the information on when Elvis played The scope.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28w9DeY5RjE Charliehd29 (talk) 17:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! However, YouTube is not a reliable source, see WP:RSPYT. If you do find a reliable source, feel free to add it to the article. However, I would instead say something like The venue has featured artists such as Elvis Presley.... ~ Eejit43 (talk) 18:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-19 edit

MediaWiki message delivery 16:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Feedback request: Wikipedia technical issues and templates request for comment edit

 

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox person on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-20 edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 16 May 2024 edit

Possible bug with the RM/TR helper edit

Hi, just wanted to let you know, I tried to use the helper to handle a move in this revision of the helpdesk, but it threw an error, stating that the draft title for Luke Charlesworth is invalid. It might just be to do with my extensions, but I figured I'd let you know. ASUKITE 15:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Also, if you want to reproduce the bug, feel free to undo this revision where I removed the link. ASUKITE 15:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'll take a look at this later, thank you! ~ Eejit43 (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Presumably the issue is that the first title was a wikilink rather than just the text of the title (diff). SilverLocust 💬 22:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! I've implemented handling for that edge case now. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 00:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-21 edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply