Hello, Angelic-alyssa! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 07:40, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Wisegal edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Wisegal, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1105745. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Spam in Innocently Charmed edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Innocently Charmed, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Innocently Charmed is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Innocently Charmed, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:00, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:Wisegal.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Wisegal.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

== Image:Wisegal.jpg missing description details ==
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Wisegal.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Welcome edit

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Helena Bonham Carter, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! BelovedFreak 20:28, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

June 2008 edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Helena Bonham Carter. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. BelovedFreak 21:42, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Helena bonham carter as bellatrix lestrange.png) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Helena bonham carter as bellatrix lestrange.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

September 2008 edit

  Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Alice in Wonderland (2010 film). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Alientraveller (talk) 18:35, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Rihanna edit

Hi
Please don't refactor other people's comments like you're doing right now. While removal of blatant vandalism and minor refactoring is OK, if in doubt don't do it. In particular, don't censor other comments, and don't remove criticism. Don't even fix typos please, and if you do, it's often best to leave a small signed note beneath the comment explaining it. Thank you. --AmaltheaTalk 19:47, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

December 2008 edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Run (Leona Lewis cover). Thank you. triwbe (talk) 16:48, 16 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

re: Anne Hathaway and awards in filmographies in general edit

The WikiProject for actors has set guidelines for filmography tables. One of those guidelines is that the word "Won" before an award is redundant and unnecessary. If an award isn't designated "Nomination" or "Nominated", then it can be safely assumed it was a win, otherwise it would not be there. Also, please don't abbreviate the names of awards when they are explicitly titled. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 19:42, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

You were given an opportunity to discuss this when I posted the above note. Simply reverting changes that you want does not mean they are stylistic changes that are endorsed by the projects governing this article. This article is designated a good article based on content and style presentation. Arbitrary changes such as these jeopardize that. Please stop or it will be considered vandalism and dealt with accordingly. Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Until the Screen Actors Guild Awards and the Golden Globe Awards have been presented, it is presumptuous to remove the "Nominated" from those. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:24, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films edit

 
Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's film-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Films? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's film-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. We also have a number of regional and topical task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! —Erik (talkcontrib) 18:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

May 2010 edit

  Your recent edit to the page I Am... Sasha Fierce appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:28, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2010 edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Rose Colored Glasses. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Lil-unique1 (talk) 17:40, 2 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Your recent edit to the page Kelly Rowland discography appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Lil-unique1 (talk) 13:48, 3 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Kelly Rowland discography edit

per WP:LINK red links which are likely to turn blue (i.e. an article is likely to be created soon) should be kept and not removed.

Also you need to use WP:edit summary everytime you make an edit. Lil-unique1 (talk) 16:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Edit Summaries edit

A polite reminder... can you please use a WP:edit summary everytime you make an edit. It is the box directly below the box where you edit the article and all you have to do is briefly mention what you did in your edit. This makes it easier for people to identify useful edits from vandalous ones. Thanks... Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:55, 4 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Just wanted to say thanks for listening to the advice above. Keep it up! And thank you for helping to update the chart peaks.! Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Beyonce Knowles edit

I really like your contributions to the article. Moreover, you have a good english. Can you help me with I Am...Sasha Fierce also? I will be very happy to work with you. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 07:41, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much. I'd love to, I'll do it now. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 11:03, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I will just tell you 4 words: You are simply great. KEEP ON THE GOOD WORK.Jivesh boodhun (talk) 16:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks very much, happy to help, I'll make my way through all her singles and albums as well. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 17:48, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. You will go very far in life. Trust me. Regards. We will keep in touch. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 17:07, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

"Debut", please edit

"début" is unheard of in American English, and Beyoncé is an American artist. Please use "debut".—Kww(talk) 21:21, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry, I don't mean to be rude, but "début" is the correct spelling in the English language, and Wikipedia is written in English. It also has to do with the enunciation of the word. The accented e changes the sound of the word, for instance: Beyoncé, with the accent it's pronounced Be-yonc-AY and with the accent in début it becomes d-AY-but. If you remove the accent from it, it changes the whole sound of the word, and technically it's spelt incorrectly. So I'm going to continue changing it to début, if I come across the word, as that's the way it should be spelt. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 11:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
No English word is spelled with diacritics. If you continue to add them, I will treat your editing as being intentionally disruptive.—Kww(talk) 15:13, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Just to be clear: "Beyoncé" is a name, so we follow her preference. "Début" is a word, so the standard American alphabet and spelling should be used.—Kww(talk) 15:16, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

'Why Don't You Love Me' edit

Hi, how do you know 'Why Don't You Love Me' peaked at #128 in the UK, not #142????? Reference????? Jivesh boodhun (talk) 18:32, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Contributor copyright investigations edit

Hello, Angelic-alyssa. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. --:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 08:11, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Helena Bonham Carter edit

Hi. You edits to the filmography and other tables removed the sorting functionality and were not helpful and I've fixed it up. Please do not edit such tables this way. Jack Merridew 20:41, 5 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Now they're back to looking bland and boring. Wonderful. Angelic-alyssa 22:07, 5 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
They're back to offering useful functionality and greater accessibility. Jack Merridew 04:42, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

October 2010 edit

  1.   Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of songs in Glee (season 2), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yves (talk) 21:45, 28 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem edit

  Your addition to The King's Speech has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:20, 30 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

I Am... World Tour edit

Thanks for your contribution. Hey i have to ask you something. Do you live in the United Kingdom? Jivesh boodhun (talk) 04:58, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

No problem, and yes I do live in the UK. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 07:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Motivation edit

Where is a reliable source for Kelly Rowland's new album being called Motivation? So far only her single has been confirmed to be called Motivation... — Lil_niquℇ 1 [talk] 19:51, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Here: http://thatgrapejuice.net/2011/02/kelly-rowland-reveals-album-title-2/Angelic-alyssa [talk] 19:54, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thatgrapejuice is NOT a reliable source... they were first to announce her album was called One Woman Show, which was later disputed by Rowland on The Today Show when she said she had never confirmed. So unless Rowland or her label confirm a title the album will remain at its title of Kelly Rowland's third album because this project has had too many false claims... only two months ago was Soundz saying he'd produced Rowland's next single titled "Make Believe" featuring Gucci Mane... — Lil_niquℇ 1 [talk] 19:58, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Nothing is a freaking reliable source anymore. First I was told not to update Helena Bonham Carter's filmography table unless IMDB puts it, so I wait until IMDB updates, post it on there and it gets removed anyway! You can never make your bloody mind's up. — Angelic-alyssa [talk] 20:00, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
ThatGrapeJuice has never been reliable. Its called common sense... TGJ has twice before reported incorrect things about the album. They've sourced things from twitter which is not reliable. If Kelly's own website only confirms the single is called "Motivation" do you no think it pays dividend to wait for official confirmation.... ? — Lil_niquℇ 1 [talk] 20:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

March 2011 edit

  Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Helena Bonham Carter has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 14:55, 26 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

On the Adele discography, twice you have changed the peak of "Set Fire to the Rain" from 2 to 1. The chart used in the article is the Dutch Top 40, on that it has peaked at 2. so stop changing it to 1, unless is climbs to 1 on there of course. thanks. Mister sparky (talk) 16:05, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Invitation edit

Hello. We talked long way back in July 2010. I hope you still remember me. You usually make amazing contributions to Beyonce articles. So would you like to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Beyoncé Knowles? Jivesh Talk2Me 10:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hey, and okay. I'm not really sure what I'd have to do, but I'll join, haha. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 20:58, 07 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Nice. I am waiting. Jivesh Talk2Me 10:52, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, what do I have to do, to join? Angelic-alyssa (talk) 15:30, 08 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Beyoncé Knowles. Edit the list of participants to put your name. That's all. Jivesh Talk2Me 19:06, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Jivesh Talk2Me 15:12, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

April 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Katy Perry discography. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hi. Please don't remove references from articles, especially when updating peaks of charts that have not yet been released. Either add a new reference, or update the existing one. Thanks. Yves (talk) 17:38, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Glee Cast discography, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please please give source for any peaks. We need to comply with Wikipedia's standard of verifiability. Thanks so much! Yves (talk) 18:16, 17 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

The source is here: http://uk.launch.yahoo.com/c/uk/single_charts.html Angelic-alyssa (talk) 01:04, 18 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

May 2011 edit

  Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Bruno Mars discography. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hi there. If you notice that I have reverted your edit, it is almost always because your edit is not sourced. If you would like to keep contributing to Wikipedia, please make sure to follow its policy on verifiability by including relevant reliable sources. Thanks. Yves (talk) 05:09, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Run the World (Girls). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:20, 3 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Filmographies edit

Why are you changing filmographies to add totally unnecessary 'align="center"' arguments? This is not specified anywhere in the Manual of Style. You do not have consensus for such a change, and you should not be forcing it into so many articles without discussion. Elizium23 (talk) 23:00, 10 May 2011 (UTC) Also, I have noticed that you removed {{sortname}} from some filmography when they needed that template placed for proper sorting. Is there some reason you are making destructive changes like this? Elizium23 (talk) 23:12, 10 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I added them because I personally believe that it improves the appearance of the table I also didn't intend to remove the sortname on any tables, for that I apologise. I was attempting to neaten up some of the filmography tables that people seem to have left uncared for, I apologise if this has caused any disruption to your work. But next to you decide to speak to me, please don't be so rude, that's unnecessary. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 00:19, 11 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Alyssa. I can see that you are having some difficulties with your changes, and I agree that everyone should be polite to you and to each other. I think you will find people will be generally helpful if you first propose your changes, and explain why you wish to make them, at the discussion or "talk" pages for the articles before making changes. Try to be patient and wait for an answer for a couple of days, in case people are offline. Obviously, this doesn't apply to objective matters, such as typos and factual errors (assuming you can cite a reliable source). Cosmetic or style changes, however, such as centering things in tables, should be discussed first, as the editors who have been working on the articles for a long time may have a reason for the choices that are made. Our Manual of Style (WP:MOS) says, with respect to most optional style issues, not to substitute your judgment for the judgment of the editors who have been working on an article, though you can try to persuade them if you feel that something should look different. If you raise an issue on a talk page, and the other editors disagree, move on to other kinds of changes - there is plenty to do here at Wikipedia without getting bogged down in arguments over minor issues. Also, see WP:V and WP:CITE regarding how to cite your sources for new information that you add. Feel free to contact me if you would like advice on anything, as I have been around for over five years. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:30, 11 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I sincerely apologise, thank you very much for your response and I will do in the future. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 08:18, 11 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please don't keep changing sortable tables to unsortable, as you've done twice at The Good Wife (TV series). Also, if your changes are reverted, before reinstating them, look at the edit history for why they were reverted. Finally, please start using edit summaries to explain your changes. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:39, 5 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yeah I realised, sorry, and I will do. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 20:47, 05 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
You used the edit summary in your latest change. It was great, thanks!--Bbb23 (talk) 20:04, 5 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please edit

Please please please participate here. Jivesh Talk2Me 10:34, 21 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

WP:BADCHARTS edit

Please do not add the Polish National Top 50, or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS to any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 15:12, 11 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

My apologies, I was unaware that it was listed there. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 16:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

July 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from 4 (Beyoncé Knowles album). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:34, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Jivesh Here edit

Hi. Do you know why i was banned? Jivesh Talk2Me 10:54, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Apparently you have been "banned permanently for stanning/trolling, especially in the Britney vs. Beyoncé AlbumClash thread." Angelic-alyssa (talk) 12:16, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Can i create another account? Jivesh Talk2Me 12:52, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
I don't know, probably not. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 14:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hi. I hope you are fine. I need your help.
  • Do you have a link which clearly states Beyonce confirmed that EOT is the third single during her concert in France?
  • Any interviews her producers, writers etc give talking about their working experience with Beyonce?
  • A link which lists all the songs that debuted below the UK Singles Chart Top[ 100 positions?

If you do not have all the answers, please try to ask on UKMIX. They will surely help. I am actually creating and article for "End of Time".

Jivesh Talk2Me 08:11, 15 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please reply. Jivesh Talk2Me 08:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I forgot to reply. I just asked on UKMix as I don't know myself. I'll let you know if they mention anything. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 14:53, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Can you please also ask on that forum if anyone has a good or several sources giving the tour dates (especially outside America) for The Beyonce Experience Tour. Jivesh Talk2Me 07:41, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Best Thing I Never Had Airplay Updates at UKMIX edit

Hello Mr. Lovett. Hope you are doing great. Can you please tell Hugo to post the full updates daily the way he used to post before Cutepie starts doing it. I do not understand anything when the latter posts it because she uses a complicated format. Please. Jivesh Talk2Me 12:23, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

He usually posts them later. Cutiepie is entitled to post it that way if she wants. Sorry. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 15:24, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Cutespie is posting updates since the least three days and so Hugo has stopped posting his version. Look at the previous pages. Jivesh Talk2Me 15:04, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Love on Top for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Love on Top is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed here until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jivesh Talk2Me 09:35, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Best Thing I Never Had Airplay Updates in the UK edit

Hi, it seems that the song was number one on the UK airplay chart for four non-consecutive weeks? Do you have any link??? Jivesh Talk2Me 17:53, 27 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't, I'm sorry. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 19:07, 27 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Can you please ask someone on the forum? I also heard that she got an award for 30,000+ plays. Jivesh Talk2Me 18:16, 27 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Party edit

Hello. It seems "Party" is not a single, as confirmed by several people visiting that forum. Can you confirm? Jivesh Talk2Me 17:24, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please reply. It would be appreciated a lot. Jivesh Talk2Me 12:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Jivesh, I'm going to university in a few days and I'm really busy, I'm sorry but I don't have time to keep asking people questions. All I know is that it hasn't been released to radio, like it was supposed to be, so I doubt that it is a current single. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 17:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Jivesh Talk2Me 13:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
As you see people here are very stubborn. Jivesh Talk2Me 05:20, 9 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

4 edit

The page that was cited is dynamic and changes it's listings. Was it archived?? I Help, When I Can.[12] 17:17, 6 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't think so. I've read from numerous places that it wasn't released then (I wouldn't know for certain, as I live in the UK and I'm not sure of all the sites for the US radio) and http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=16691 this also confirms "Love on Top" being the next single, if you'd like to update it? Angelic-alyssa (talk) 21:09, 6 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Helena Bonham Carter edit

Thank you for cleaning up my links.KlappCK (talk) 13:14, 9 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

No problem :) Angelic-alyssa (talk) 17:07, 9 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

"Party"'s release date edit

Please participate and help clear the confusion here. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 05:02, 23 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please let us know what you think edit

My friend, as you know, Beyonce's new album 4 is being handled in a catastrophic way (i do not know if this is a correct word). Please voice your opinion here so that we can decide which format will suit "Party" that best. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 15:35, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Another discussion, this time regarding "Love on Top" edit

First of all, my sincere thanks for your participation in previous Beyonce-related discussion. I request you to please weigh your opinion here. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 06:36, 10 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Source... edit

... this? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:26, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. In Michael Ball (singer), you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Empire Theatre and The O2 Arena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oops, sorry! I was meaning to check, it must have slipped my mind. I'll be more careful in the future. Thanks for letting me know. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 18:44, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

My Sincere Wishes For This Festive Season edit

  ★*★*★*★*★*★*★*★* Merry Christmas And Happy New Year 2012 *★*★*★*★*★*★*★*★
I Wish You And Your Family A Merry Christmas And A Happy New Year 2012. May The New Year Bring Much Happiness, Prosperity, Peace, And Success In Your Life. I Am Very Happy To be Part of Wikipedia And To Have Great Friends Like You. Cheers.

- From A Big Fan of   ----> Jivesh1205 (Talk) 16:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. When you recently edited Sheridan Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West End (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Request re: Musicals articles edit

Happy New Year, Alyssa. The consensus at the Musicals project was not to put quotation marks around the song names in the song lists, although we do use them in the plot summaries and elsewhere in the narrative portions of the articles. Would you please leave them out in the song lists? Also, would you please not remove the double spaces after periods? Two spaces helps editors to see, in the edit screen, where a sentence has ended. It does not affect the reader's view. Finally, why are you changing col-break to col-2? Is there an advantage to that change? In addition, a space after the col-break helps editors to see where each column ends. These minor format items are for the convenience of the people who work frequently on these articles, so I hope you will help us out by not making these changes in other articles. Finally, Tony Awards are more important than Drama Desk awards and should be listed first. It should not be alphabetical, but rather should show the most prestigious awards first for each production. I don't think Outer Critics' Circle and lesser awards should be listed at all, unless the production is not a Broadway production. Audience choice awards should not be listed. Thanks. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:50, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Edits in Curtains edit

Hello, I am curious as to why you removed the Outer Circle Critics Awards section from Curtains (musical). Those awards are significant, and if they aren't cited in the article, they are elsewhere on Wikipedia (like on the nominee's individual articles, like Jason Danieley and Karen Ziemba). -The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire (talk) 18:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I removed them as I had added them to tables in previous Musical pages and had been told that the awards aren't deemed important enough. The important awards for Broadway shows are Tony Awards and Drama Desk Awards. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 20:24, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm.... alright, that's fine. Your decision was correct; I just wonder why they only want the important awards up on this article. You've got celebrity articles that have awards like "Ranked #57 hottest in (fill-in-the-blank) magazine" and those awards are deemed as fine. It just makes me wonder... Anyway, thanks for shedding some light! -The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire (talk) 22:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Who told you this? You deleted a lot of award information from Jersey Boys and disguised it as a minor edit when it is nothing of the sort. Varlaam (talk) 21:34, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
My apologies, I don't know why I did that, and Ssilvers told me that they had no place. I was personally keeping them in, until he told me to stop. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 10:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
If there is a standard, or some de facto standard, then that's ok.
The issue is deleting genuine content, marking it m, whilst saying nothing.
That's the problem.
The summary should be, whatever, "Current standard only allows tabulation of X and Y awards", or your own phrasing that conveys that.
I reverted your edit as vandalism since I had just been cleaning up after an actual vandal moments earlier.
Varlaam (talk) 18:21, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Need your help edit

Hi. I saw you have made a many contributions to the UK charts series of articles. I've recently created a similar series of articles of the U.S. singles charts by decade, which are built the same way the British ones are (by decade and with statistics).

These are the articles​​:

Unfortunately, there are some Wikipedians whom oppose keeping these articles around, claiming that they are essentially a duplication of information which already exists in other articles (namely, the extended articles covering individual years in the U.S. singles chart) and therefore they are in their opinion redundant – even though in my opinion, these articles present the chart lists more effectively (through sortable lists with reduced redundant data) and contain statistics by decade which does not exist elsewhere on Wikipedia. Despite this opposition, so far three of these articles have ​​survived individual AfDs. Nevertheless, according to this current ongoing deletion review it seems that very soon another bigger AfD is going to be held in which the fate of ALL these articles is going to be determined in a voting. I myself believe that these articles have a lot of potential and could be further expanded/developed. Nevertheless, if this potential would not be demonstrated soon enough, I fear the outcome of the upcoming voting, knowing that many Wikipedians might not see the value in such a series and/or its potential to be further expanded/developed.

Because you have had a lot of experience in developing the British charts articles, I assume you might have some good insights on how to expanding this series of articles as well. I would appreciate any help you would be able to provide in expanding/developing this series of articles.

Thanks in advance. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 02:29, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notice edit

Please reference your addition(s). Jivesh1205 (Talk)

Thank you. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Matilda the Musical edit

I have reverted your award edit. The olivier awards need to be there but not at the expense of the others. They are no less notable or important to the production history. You also needed to reference the awards. I have re added them, but will need to try and integrate into one table but will do that later.Edinburgh Wanderer 15:48, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Care to comment? edit

Hi. Would you like to comment here? An editor proposed to note all the tracks that the credited people on the album are on, such as: (bullet) Name - instrument/role (track #, #, #, etc.). I don't have much precendant, but the guidelines at WP:Albums show differently (Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_guide#Personnel) I am arguing that the editor's addition is undue. Dan56 (talk) 23:18, 18 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 4 edit

Hi. When you recently edited Alison Jiear, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hot Mikado (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 11 edit

Hi. When you recently edited Candide (operetta), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Baker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Azelma edit

Catherine is not Azelma. Her character is landladys daughter. A different landlady to the thenardiers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.161.162.122 (talk) 13:20, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

You might want to tell that to IMDb then. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 17:01, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 28 edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

22nd Tony Awards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie
25th Tony Awards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bye Bye Birdie
26th Tony Awards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Country Girl
29th Tony Awards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Robin Wagner
33rd Tony Awards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Inspector General
38th Tony Awards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Peter Larkin
45th Tony Awards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bye, Bye Birdie

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 5 edit

Hi. When you recently edited Drood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revival (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 5 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 19 edit

Hi. When you recently edited Celia Keenan-Bolger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heartland (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:24, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 3 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scrooge (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revival (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:14, 3 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 22 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cheryl Cole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital FM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 15 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited We Will Rock You (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 15 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 23 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of musicals: A to L, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eddie Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 30 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of musicals: A to L, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alfred Newman and Dick Howard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

December 2012 edit

  Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sacha Baron Cohen, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 14:33, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas edit

  Merry Christmas
May your Christmas sparkle with moments of love, laughter and goodwill,

May the year ahead be full of contentment and joy,

May the good times and treasures of the present become the golden memories of tomorrow,

Merry Christmas To U & Ur Family.

Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:16, 24 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Super Bowl XLVII halftime show edit

Hurricane Beyonce caused a power failure! --Another Believer (Talk) 18:53, 4 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cinderella (2013 Broadway production) edit

When you insert those tables into articles about musicals, would you kindly put the Tony Awards first and then the Drama Desk and then the lesser awards (with respect to each production)? This would be extremely helpful. Thanks. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much! IMO it makes much more sense to list the most prestigious awards first. -- Ssilvers (talk) 13:43, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 8 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of musicals: A to L, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Warren Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 15 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Drama Desk Award for Outstanding Musical (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Jack Murphy
List of musicals: M to Z (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Dempsey

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Drama Desk Awards edit

Hello ! just wanted to say nice work on the Drama Desk awards putting them into new charts - I started to do it but it takes me a long time and I've been busy - I think the new ones are so much better to read and everything ! Thanks ! HesioneHushabye (talk) 05:27, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hey! No worries. I have some spare time on my hands and I was bored, so I thought why not! Haha. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 22:30, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 25 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jenna Russell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merrily We Roll Along (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 5 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of musicals: M to Z, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alfred Newman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 5 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Happy Holidays! edit

  Happy Holidays!
Hi, Angelic-alyssa! Have a happy and safe season, and a blessed new year!
Holiday cheers, --Discographer (talk) 00:24, 25 December 2013 (UTC) Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 30 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of musicals: M to Z, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Bissell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 6 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of accolades received by Little Miss Sunshine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Albert Berger
List of musicals: A to L (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Alfred Grünwald

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 6 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to MTV Movie Award for Best Jaw Dropping Moment may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | ''[[Flight (2012 film)|Flight]]'')
  • | ''[[Skyfall]]'')

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:11, 6 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 30 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laurence Olivier Award for Best New Comedy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Clouds (play), Quartet (play) and Anyone for Denis? (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 10 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laurence Olivier Award for Best Comedy Performance, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anyone for Denis? and Black Snow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 12 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drama Desk Award for Outstanding Actor in a Play, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Merrick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 12 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 4 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drama Desk Award for Outstanding Revival of a Musical, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Bissell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Drama Desk edit

Hello - just wanted to leave you a note and say nice job working on the Drama Desk pages - they needed major updating. I started doing it but it's a lot of work - thanks! HesioneHushabye (talk) 08:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hey! No worries, I enjoy it. Glad you like the pages. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 12:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Tony Award Discussion edit

Hello - there is a discussion happening at the bottom of this page [[1]] about if the nominations list should have character names or not. I know you have tried adding character names to Tony Award for Best Featured Actress in a Play and I have as well, and the creator of the list keeps taking them off. I think the character names are an important part of the list and should be there. Let us know your thoughts on this. Thanks! HesioneHushabye (talk) 23:34, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2014 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Hot Dance Club Songs, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - eo (talk) 11:38, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 1 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2016 Laurence Olivier Awards
added a link pointing to Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk
Laurence Olivier Award for Outstanding Achievement in Opera
added a link pointing to Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Adding unsourced chart positions edit

Please do not add unsourced chart positions to Wikipedia, as you did earlier at Beyoncé discography. Until Billboard's artist chart history pages update, you need to cite your sources. Stating in your edit summary "according to Billboard" is not sufficient. It isn't hard to copypaste a URL to show others where you got said information from. Ss112 04:55, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 29 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited UK Singles Chart records and statistics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages All Saints and Jailhouse Rock. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 28 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black Reel Award for Best Original or Adapted Song, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miguel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé edit

Hi, Angelic-alyssa, I wanted to let you know I've undone your last edit on List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé, as you added Destiny's Child awards and used IMDB as a source. Adding those awards is just a way to inflate her numbers, and generate misinformation and inaccuracy. For example, in your edit Beyoncé has 11 American Music Awards: she officially has 6 AMAs. Other ex group members in WP only have their awards as a solo artist. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 06:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

I'm confused. There are several awards listed on that page for Destiny's Child songs, how exactly are we supposed to know which awards she can be credited for and which she can't? It's a bit nonsensical considering that she will physically have the award sitting on a shelf at home. How is it NOT her award? She received that award during her career, whether it was solo or part of a group... Angelic-alyssa (talk) 10:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Angelic-alyssa: Michael Jackson awards doesn't feature Jackson 5 awards. Justin Timberlake awards doesn't feature NSYNC awards. Why? because those are the awards for the group, not for them. They weren't solo back then; and of the trophies don't say "Winner: Beyoncé", but "Winner: Destiny' Child." Btw, only Grammy Awards credit every member. The numbers are inaccurate and it seems you're just inflating numbers. Please, feel free to add the notable awards that are missing, but no non-notable awards or the ones received by the group. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Angelic-alyssa: Please, can you remove repeated links to the same award on the awards table? per WP:OLINK. For example, Best R&B Song is linked numerous times on Grammy Awards. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 10 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black Reel Award for Outstanding Director, TV Movie or Limited Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Crime. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 17 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black Reel Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Brothers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 30 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MTV Video Music Award for Best Long Form Video, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lemonade (album). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

List of best-selling music artists edit

Please don't change the sales figures of the artists. The List of best-selling music artists requires certain amount of certified sales for all artists based on their first year of charting. This is all stated in the lead of the list. Having said that, Beyonce has begun charting in 2002, therefore, her claimed sales need to be supported by 71.3% certified sales. That means her inflated 190 million records in sales must be supported by 135 million certified units, which Beyonce doesn't have.--Harout72 (talk) 00:35, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Beyoncé is wildly undercertified though. For example, "Crazy in Love" has sold 3 million copies in the US and is still certified Gold. The fact that she's still listed as 85 million when she's sold over 100 million more records than that is just ridiculous. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 11:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 4 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michelle Williams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Angelic-alyssa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey edit

  1. ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey edit

Disambiguation link notification for March 26 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NAACP Image Award for Outstanding Comedy Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Boondocks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 3 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

NAACP Image Award for Outstanding Actress in a Drama Series
added a link pointing to Empire (TV series)
NAACP Image Award for Outstanding Performance by a Youth (Series, Special, Television Movie or Limited-series)
added a link pointing to The Cheetah Girls
NAACP Image Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series
added a link pointing to News Radio

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 22 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Groundhog Day (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 29 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited In Transit (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve French. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 10 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Meet Me in St. Louis (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West End. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Angelic-alyssa. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017 edit

 

Your recent editing history at Camila Cabello discography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You will need a better source than Amazon.co.jp for a contentious name change. You claim there are "other sites that have updated" with the data. Where? Your move of The Hurting. The Healing. The Loving. was undone by another editor. You should probably wait. Ss112 15:57, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Also, your edit to Beyoncé discography has been reverted because you didn't actually check most of the references at all, it appears. The French and Irish sources at the tops of the columns don't prove the peaks in the featured singles section, and the Billboard links are the old ones. Until there are more comprehensive references added to the page, do not remove the extra sources as they are unverifiable. Ss112 15:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Angelic-alyssa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Angelic-alyssa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! edit

  The Editor's Barnstar
I just wanted to say thanks so much for your edits to List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé! Your effort and dedication for improving the article is admirable and much appreciated! Bgkc4444 (talk) 21:36, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2022 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Beyoncé discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ss112 07:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

BAFTA edit

I do apologize if I seemed sassy, but I was watching a film and the edit was too overwhelming to peruse through. All I noticed was the table was too wide and it had no edit summary to explain its purpose, which technically permits someone to revert unexplained changes. You've clearly been on Wikipedia for a while, so I'm sure you're aware of H:FIES, but anyway, your second effort made the chart wider, so I did bother this time with a few trial-and-errors and found the most comfortable fit: 82%. I'm guessing the real botheration you had was the gigantic sidebar of British Actor/Foreign Actor, since the ladies' side had done away with it aesthetically looking like that? --Cinemaniac86TalkStalk 00:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Don't worry, that was my bad for not including an edit summary. I spent so long on trying to streamline the formatting, so each of the tables matched (as each of them varied slightly from one another) as well as the other awards pages for BAFTA, so your comment just struck a nerve a little bit. I appreciate you reaching out! Thanks so much for finding the most effective table width. The previous ones worked perfectly for me, but I maybe my laptop screen dimensions impacted that. Thanks again for sorting! – Angelic-alyssa (talk) 07:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 11 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 61st British Academy Film Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply