To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

October 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Ham and cheese sandwich has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

November 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm John Cline. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Expo 2020, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —John Cline (talk) 08:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Anbe Sivam because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! K6ka (talk) 02:51, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Audisankara College of Engineering & Technology. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Philip Trueman (talk) 01:11, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Twsx. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Mike Jackson, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ twsx | talkcont | ~ 14:00, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Karuneegar. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop adding unsourced material. All material added, especially contentious material, must have a reliable source. Please see WP:RS. Further unsourced additions can result in being blocked. Bgwhite (talk) 09:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Regarding Karuneegar edit

The entire content of the article Karuneegar was completely unsourced. We do not accept original research. You need to follow our policies on reliable sources, please read WP:RS. Such websites, like the one you have cited, promoted by the community itself, is not considered as reliable, you have to look for text references, and that too reliable ones. For example, if you go through the article on Kayastha, you will find that each and every statement is reliably sourced and the references are categorically mentioned. Its not just me, any other editor reviewing the page, or any administrator will again remove all such statements, if these are incorporated without citing valid references. Like User:Qwyrxian had done before. Therefore, if you actually want to improve the article, find proper sources (not a website on Karuneegar, which is nothing but WP:OR) and discuss the statements you wish to incorporate, along with valid references. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 04:36, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at East Kilbride with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to East Kilbride with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:48, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to East Kilbride. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Qatar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Widr (talk) 15:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2014 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of people claimed to possess an eidetic memory has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of people claimed to possess an eidetic memory was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/gayatrikhasiram) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Mauritania. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Gilliam (talk) 15:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Morons edit

So, to sum this up: five edits in five months (that's 1 edit/month) that have largely consisted in providing information that "didn't appear constructive" to another editor (that's one to chalk against WP:POV) and one unsourced citation, and you block an entire dynamic IP that is shared by thousands of machines?

The level of human stupidity will never cease to amaze me... 54.240.197.233 (talk) 16:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Public, West Bromwich. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Gilliam (talk) 09:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lough Mahon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''Lough Mahon''' {{lga|Loch Machain}}) is a [[sea lough]] situated in the north-western part of Cork Harbour. It has a total area of 12.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:29, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of child prodigies because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2014 edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

May 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Luxembourg (city), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:05, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fucking killjoy.

Possible Vandalism edit

Hi, I'm IvyJohn. I recently undid one of your edits to Cyril because it seemed unconstructive and offensive. If you disagree, please take these steps:

-Don't be offended. I didn't undo your edit out of spite, and wish in no way to insult you.
-Don't revise the edit. That is Edit Warring, and could get us both in trouble. Instead,
-Discuss it on My Talk Page. If I made a mistake, I'll own up to it, but you have to point it out, or I'll think I was right.

Have a nice day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by IvyJohn (talkcontribs) 11:54, 15 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 20 May edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

June 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vikas Swarup may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Category:1963 births

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Henrique Hilário, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geoff Who, me? 12:02, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Waggers. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Template:Cork Harbour, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. WaggersTALK 09:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2014 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ricky Martin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. buffbills7701 02:30, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Repeated vandalism edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Suman Chakraborty, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 01:16, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. Jeppiz (talk) 01:17, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2015 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ra's al Ghul. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:40, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015 edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Adolphe Sax ‎ ‎ , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:47, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

June 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Garg has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 08:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm Ilyushka88. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sandfields, Port Talbot— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ilyushka88 | Talk! Contribs 21:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)Reply