User talk:205.254.147.8

Andy Milonakis

You have recently vandalized a Wikipedia article, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

Here are a few links you might find useful:

• User tutorial
• Help desk
• Policy on maintaining a neutral point of view
• Policy for content when editing articles and creating new ones

If you want to continue editing here, I hope you will create an account and take it seriously. I'm looking forward to seeing your contributions, and if you have any questions, feel free to contact me for help. Kafziel ^Talk 17:39, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Virtual private network. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Res2216firestar 19:12, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Cynrin 19:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Badge photo image in Q clearance

While making replicas or realistic copies of access badges is undoubtedly unlawful under U.S. law, I would be very surprised to learn that news photographs of badges are unlawful, as they often appear in news media. If you assert otherwise, please cite a source before removing the image again. --MCB 20:48, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi there. I'd like to ask you and your NNSA colleague who have been removing the image to identify yourselves on the article talk page (Talk:Q clearance) and let us know if you have reclassified the source image. Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert 07:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Please read the article Talk page

Please read Talk:Q clearance#Badge_photo and respond there before making further edits to Q clearance. Thank you, --MCB 01:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Final warning

Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Q clearance, you will be blocked. --MCB 19:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

You need to talk to us on the Talk:Q clearance talk page and explain how this is breaking the law. Please don't delete it again until you explain what the reasoning is. Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert 21:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Please contact the Wikimedia Foundation

Please contact the foundation (see contact info at: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Contact_us ). You need to talk to Brad Patrick, the corporate counsel. Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert 21:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

I have been made aware of the issue. Email me if you would like to clarify your position.--Brad Patrick 17:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Where is the discussion of this issue taking place? I checked Talk:Q clearance, User talk:Georgewilliamherbert, my own Talk page, Image_talk:Q-clearance_badge.jpg, and of course here, but there's nothing since my last post(s) and one by Georgewilliamherbert. Thanks, --MCB 22:23, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

The Wikipedia:Mailing lists wikien-l mailing list. I think I assumed you would be on the list, I would have said something to you if I had realized otherwise. My apologies. Georgewilliamherbert 02:47, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

October 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Phil Kerpen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --lquilter 21:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Shrek, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ccrashh 15:11, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Kwame Brown has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 20:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Miguel Tejada, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please feel free to re-add your contribution when you have properly cited the source.

June 2008

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Miguel Tejada. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Janus Shadowsong | contribs 19:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Staunton, Virginia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Staunton, Virginia was changed by 205.254.147.8 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-07-18T20:09:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:10, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Staunton, Virginia constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Ajh16 (talk) 20:12, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to JaMarcus Russell ‎, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 15:50, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 2009 World Series. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:16, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Donna Halper has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 18:39, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

May 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ALI ^{nom nom} 17:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jack Abramoff, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Trijnstel (talk) 16:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2011

Your recent edit to the page Swarm behaviour appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Epipelagic (talk) 19:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Jonathan Silver with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Harry (talk) 16:07, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

February 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Dead Man Walking (film). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:10, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Joshua Topolsky, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   21:56, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

• Just passing through (spotted this on Recent Changes), but surely the name given in the birth announcement in Ref. 1 is sufficient evidence to corroborate this user's assertion? DWeir (talk) 22:07, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Malformed DR/N

The page you a directing the DR/N to does not exist. Please use the accurate page title to direct volunteers and participants to as well as the talkpage where the dispute has been discussed extenslively.--Amadscientist (talk) 20:24, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

It is suggested that the filing editor create a registered account to file their case as this IP is shared with multiple users and could cause confusion should the case be opened. Since there appears to be some problems it will also help for volunteers to communicate directly to involved parties.--Amadscientist (talk) 20:43, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

March 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Northrop Grumman EA-6B Prowler, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:52, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Eurasian brown bear, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Technopat (talk) 18:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---