124.215.201.5

July 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ishrat Jahan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Millahnna (mouse)talk 04:48, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ishrat Jahan, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Mithrandir^∞ (Talk!) (Opus Operis) 04:56, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User talk:MithrandirAgain.   — Jeff G. ツ 05:02, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Blocked for 72 hours

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:26, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

124.215.201.5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been trying to make the article unbiased but the other users with a racial mindset deleted my edits and reported me for blocking. Allowing such blocks will only lessen the credibility of Wiki articles. The original articles was completely biased on a Police version which was criticized by Human Rights Organization.

Decline reason:

WP:NOTTHEM. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 06:00, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

References

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

124.215.201.5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I only tried to change the biased statements after the edit of 117.199.48.196. I saw that now and that is why I tried to remove. The post before that by Vvarkey was somewhat neutral version of the story and at least you should keep that. I am sorry that I tried to modify the contents rather than trying to revert the changes by 117.199.48.196. I only did this in good intention and to keep the credibility of this article. At least please revert the changes by 117.199.48.196 to changes by Vvarkey. I also request Wikipedia to check the edits by me and point out what is disruptive and why is that disruptive.

Decline reason:

You were clearly edit warring, see WP:EW. Believing that you are in the right, and that someone else is wrong, does not allow you an exemption from Wikipedia's behavioral policies. Jayron32 06:22, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Maz Jobrani, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Theopolisme _TALK 14:33, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Div-e-Sepid. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Theopolisme _TALK 18:11, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Denial. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lova Falk talk 17:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

May 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Honoré de Balzac. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Deli nk (talk) 00:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---