Template talk:Wotnav

WikiProject Novels (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

WoT navigation box?

Robert Jordan's

The Wheel of Time

Major characters
Minor characters
Places
Events
Concepts

I've noticed that the See also list on some of the WoT articles is pretty uniform from article to article, and that it's starting to take up a fair bit of space.

I wonder if a navigation box of some sort linking to the top-level lists might not be a better solution? Either a box that sits at the right margin, or a template for the bottom of each page. I've included a couple possible styles, but obviously they can be modified to suit the purposes of the WoT experts here. Once something more permanent is hashed out (presuming it is agreed that this is even a good idea) we can move the template to the template namespace and start adding it to articles.

One style note—I recommend strongly resisting the urge to add every character, place, and concept to the navigation box; it would get to be unbelievably huge.



Robert Jordan's The Wheel of Time
Major characters | Minor characters | Places | Events | Concepts

Discussion

To avoid inadvertent munging of the box layouts, discussion is best confined to this section down here. Cheers! --TenOfAllTrades(talk) 23:33, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wikiproject

I have started a proposal to create Wikiproject: Wheel of Time (or at least a Task Force). Please comment here. Nutiketaiel (talk) 14:24, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Remove WoTMUD

Per the deletion of the WoTMUD article, I am removing WoTMUD from the template. --Pstanton (talk) 02:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Black Ajah

In brief reasons for the Black Ajah belong to the Aes Sedai category: 1)While not being bound by the 3 oaths, they are (or were) almost always believed as Aes Sedai - and most still think of themselves as Aes Sedai. 2)To be a member of the Black Ajah, they must be Aes Sedai. 3)They have defined the History and course of the Aes Sedai more than any of the other Ajahs.

That duplication is wrong is untrue, they can fall into more than one group, and should be recognised as doing so. Jakerin (talk) 19:10, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

& see the black Ajah article itself, which calls them a "Secret Society of Aes Sedai". Being bound by the 3 oaths does not define Aes Sedai as such. Jakerin (talk) 19:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)