Template talk:Major information technology companies
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Funandtrvl in topic too many telecommunications companies
 | This template was considered for deletion on 2018 January 25. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Major information technology companies template. |
|
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What is a major company? edit
Inclusion criteria need to be set for this template as it is unclear what qualifies a company as "major". --Biker Biker (talk) 12:30, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
- You are obviously unable to read, the inclusion methodology is stated at the bottom of the template.
- And once again, please do not edit war to try to impose changes to what is a stable template transcluded into a large number of articles. This is simply unacceptable, particularly in view of your failure to even read the template properly before doing so.Rangoon11 (talk) 12:33, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
too many telecommunications companies edit
US$20 billion will be better Daveduv (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
- Good idea.92.23.82.149 (talk) 18:59, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- really necessary 180.165.59.112 (talk) 16:17, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- Since the telecommunications companies and mobile phone operators have templates of their own at Category:Telecommunications company templates, and because this template is already pretty big, I've edited out the telco companies and I'll update the telecommunications templates instead, to make sure they're included. Funandtrvl (talk) 19:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Karbonn and Micromax edit
Both of the above companies fail the applicable methodology and should be removed.92.23.82.149 (talk) 19:01, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Point of sale edit
Toshiba has acquired IBM's point-of-sale business, making it the world's largest vendor of point-of-sale systems, and should replace IBM in that .92.23.82.149 (talk) 19:19, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
consciously approach may be ideal edit
This option is satisfactory when visually comparing samples superb to well a uniform specified reference — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.240.163.34 (talk) 20:12, 25 June 2013 (UTC)