Template:Did you know nominations/Catherine Courtney, Baroness Courtney of Penwith

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination  The following is an archived discussion of Catherine Courtney, Baroness Courtney of Penwith's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination's (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the DYK WikiProject's (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:50, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Catherine Courtney, Baroness Courtney of Penwith edit

Catherine Courtney in 1883

Created by Surtsicna (talk). Self nom at 17:24, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Length, date verified. Hook's ref requires subscription so accepted AGF from seasoned editor. All non-lead paragraphs have the same ref; it is a RS. Couldn't check for close paraphrasing because of subscription requirement, but again AGF. QPQ done. Interesting hook; hook length is fine. Good to go. Thanks for an interesting article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosiestep (talkcontribs)
Yes; thanks for the adding my signature. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:16, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
  • I do have access to the source, and am concerned that some of the structure and phrasing in this article is rather close to it. The problem might be alleviated through a diversification of sources, if possible; hewing too closely to the source is a more frequent problem when there's only one source being used. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:38, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your input. Accedie was kind enough to agree to help out with restructuring and I believe she's done a wonderful job. Is the article alright now? Surtsicna (talk) 12:32, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Much better, but it would benefit from a bit more work, particularly in the end of marriage and beginning of war. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:58, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Done, methinks. Surtsicna (talk) 19:34, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
ODNB source now clear, don't have access to the other sources. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
  • I believe this is now acceptable to all. It is new enough and long enough. The image is in the public domain and the hook has an inline citation to a source not accessible to me. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:18, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank you for choosing this poor stale nomination. Surtsicna (talk) 11:02, 3 February 2013 (UTC)