Talk:York–Beverley line

Notes

There's no comment about the lengt of the track, should be added. Furthermore, I think it's appropriate to add a reference to the installation of the first automatic lifting boom barriers to be used in Britain along the line. --Dionysos1988 (talk) 17:25, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Have you any detail and reference that could be used? Keith D (talk) 21:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

No, unfortunately I don't. I couldn't find anything via Google, and I don't have any printed literature about that. But I think there should be some...--Dionysos1988 (talk) 23:31, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

The wikipedia article on Warthill includes mention of the barriers and "Railway Signs and Signals of Great Britain". and "BRITISH RAILWAYS 1920 - 1970"., although not primary sources, both mention the installation. And here's a picture - [1] Scillystuff (talk) 00:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Ahha, a primary source - Report on Level Crossing Protection based on a visit to the Netherlands, Belgian and French Railways by officers of the Ministry of Transport and Civil Aviation and of the British Transport Commission (PDF). London: HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE - Ministry of Transport and Civil Aviation. 1957. p. 16. Retrieved 8 March 2010.Scillystuff (talk) 00:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Oh, great! Thank you. That's exactly the reference we need. I'll paste it into the German article. :-) --Dionysos1988 (talk) 00:31, 8 March 2010 (UTC) PS: There's only missing the date of 1953, but I think that's negligible.--Dionysos1988 (talk) 00:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I have added the reference here and at the Warthill page. Have you any idea of the copyright status of the sabre images as I cannot locate any mention on the website, would be good if they were usable. Keith D (talk) 02:24, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

?

Quote (removed from the article)

However documents published in 2006 as part of the suggest that new routes into and around these existing built up areas have been identified and safeguarded alongside potential sites for new stations. (Specifically See Section 5.5 : "Protecting New Transport Schemes" and Appendix 2 : Maps 5 and 6)

East Riding of Yorkshire Council. "Local Development Framework Transport Development Plan". Retrieved 11 February 2009.

In the version I can see - it doesn't - the lines go around like in the 2004 report.. ?? Prof.Haddock (talk) 03:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:York–Beverley line/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

. Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates Requires infobox/route map Copy edit for WP:MOS Keith D 11:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 11:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 11:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on York to Beverley Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140714191613/http://www2.eastriding.gov.uk/EasysiteWeb/getresource.axd?AssetID=105280&type=full&servicetype=Attachment to http://www2.eastriding.gov.uk/EasysiteWeb/getresource.axd?AssetID=105280&type=full&servicetype=Attachment

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Redhill to Tonbridge Line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:16, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Waterloo to Reading Line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)