Talk:Wideband Global SATCOM

Categories

I'm unsure what to do about categories for this article, as it is about the system as a whole rather than just the satellites. Any suggestions? (Sdsds - Talk) 16:57, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

You know that's actually a good point, one in fact I never really considered. The article does in fact try to address the constellation as a whole, rather than deal with an individual satellite. But by comparing it with the excellent page on GPS, they've decided to make the article all inclusive. As such, maybe we should consider categorizing it in a similar way. (Kronik overkill - Talk) 16:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Australia buying into program buying one themselves?

From the Australian newspaper

Unsure if this is the right program please verify add?

Looks right it says 5 in article then says australia paying for one of the six.

[1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.96.65.142 (talk) 20:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

usa paid for 5, aus paid for 1, it is a joint us/aus partnership with each to have access to the 6, perhaps the article should reflect this ..as far as i know and have read, only usa and australia will exclusive use this system, i noticed in the copy that said it will be used by many nations, i think you will find this is wrong http://www.spacewar.com/reports/US_And_Australia_Share_New_Communications_Satellites_999.html here is another link to the partnership http://www.deagel.com/news/Australia-Gets-Access-to-Wideband-Global-SATCOM-System_n000003065.aspx

International Partners

I removed the following and refered it to the talk page, as I think there maybe a mixup between WGS and the AEHS system. It can be replaced when and if there is an official USA statement linked to it, does everyone agree ?

After the United States and Australia also some other countries have intrests in the programme, on October 10th 2011 the Dutch Defense minister Hans Hillen announced that he would join the group of international partners for the WGS programme following Canada, Denmark , Luxembourg and New-Zealand. All will be paying for the 9th satteliet together with de United States

112.213.152.52 (talk) 03:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Nathan Johnson (talk) 01:24, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

---

Wideband Global SATCOM system → Wideband Global SATCOM – The name of the system is "Wideband Global SATCOM", the word "system" is not part of the name, nor is it needed to provide disambiguation. W. D. Graham 10:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC) W. D. Graham 10:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wideband Global SATCOM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070108061443/http://www.afspc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=5582 to http://www.afspc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=5582

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Update of link for Canadian participation

Greetings,

Yes, I'd update the link myself, however there's a choice to be made between two new links and I'd rather the original contributor select which is more appropriate.

The original lead to this page, which generates a 404 error. http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/news/article.page?doc=canada-s-participation-in-the-wideband-global-satellite-communications-system/hgq87xyn

A search suggests:

https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/news/2017/03/new_satellite_toenhancecommunicationscapabilitiesforcanadianarme.html

or

https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/maple-leaf/rcaf/migration/2017/new-satellite-will-enhance-canadian-armed-forces-communications-capabilities.html

Cheers Sailargh (talk) 04:50, 18 June 2022 (UTC)