Talk:Web of Things

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Networking / Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Comments edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is too biased on the vision of webofthings.org guys. The term "web of things" is somehow prior art and cannot be limited to the vision of a RESTful interconnection of object. I cite at least two previous works in the field that coined the term "web of Thing" without limiting to REST services. Web of things vision cannot let aside web services languages and tools.

Davide Carboni,Pietro Zanarini Wireless Wires: Let the Users Build the Ubiquitous Computer In Proc. of MUM 2007 - 6th Int. Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM Press. 2007

and

B. Traversat, M. Abdelaziz, D. Doolin, M. Duigou, J.C. Hugly, e E. Pouyoul, “Project JXTA-C: Enabling a web of things,” 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’03), 2003, pag. 282.

References were added.

93.144.144.181 (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2010 (UTC) Davide CarboniReply

Merge with Internet of Things? edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Could this article be merged somehow with Internet of Things? Pdxuser (talk) 21:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure that would be a good idea. In the research community, we tend to see the WoT as distinct from IoT. You can see this in the fact that there are WoT workshops/Symposia etc separate from IoT venues. I think also that the WoT community tends to define itself as "more than" or "different from" IoT. So I'd vote to keep a separate WoT page. Rodgerlea (talk) 17:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I also agree with the previous comment. From the standardization point of view, WoT related topics are also not discussed in Internet standardization groups but Web standardization groups. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Egekorkan (talk • contribs) 14:19, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

I also agree, it should be merged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alkis0 (talk • contribs) 15:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic