Talk:U.S. Route 40 Scenic

      Good article U.S. Route 40 Scenic has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
      July 12, 2012 Good article nominee Listed
      WikiProject U.S. Roads (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
      U.S. Roads WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
      Topics
       GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
       Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
      USRD MTF.svg
      		 This article has a map. If the map has an error, please work with the maps task force to correct it.
      USRD KML.svg
      		 This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the maps task force to correct it.
      This article has been recognized in the following venues:
      Updated DYK query.svg
      		 A fact from this article was featured on the Did you know? section of the U.S. Roads Portal in June 2009.

      GA Review

      Toolbox

      See WP:DEADREF
      for dead URLs
      This review is transcluded from Talk:U.S. Route 40 Scenic/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

      Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 02:08, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


      GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
      1. It is reasonably well written.
        a (prose):
        b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
      2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
        a (references):
        b (citations to reliable sources):
        c (OR):
      3. It is broad in its coverage.
        a (major aspects):
        b (focused):
      4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
        Fair representation without bias:
      5. It is stable.
        No edit wars, etc.:
      6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
        a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
        b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
      7. Overall:
        Pass/Fail:


      Infobox

      • No issues

      Lead

      • No issues

      Route description

      • No issues

      History

      • No issues

      Junction list

      • No issues

      References

      • No issues


      After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have concluded that it meets the good article criteria at this time. Awesome job and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 21:13, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

      ↑Jump back a section
      Last modified on 18 September 2012, at 14:01