Talk:Tom Bombadil

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

(Rated B-class, High-importance)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.

Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.

This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Fictional characters

(Rated C-class)

Fictional characters portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.

This is not a forum for general discussion about Tom Bombadil. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Tom Bombadil at the Reference desk, discuss relevant Wikipedia policy at the Village pump, or ask for help at the Help desk.

Feedback requested on Nickel Creek mention

My addition to this Talk page (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tom_Bombadil&oldid=553064178&diff=prev) was reverted with an incorrect reason. My addition was clearly a simple statement of fact, and so was clearly not intended as promotion. Anyone please offer feedback. David Spector (talk) 18:21, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Why were you adding a simple statement of fact to the Talk page? Article talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, and it's not clear to me how the removed material relates to improving the article. The link provided does not establish that the song is considered significant in some manner either, that I can see. Doniago (talk) 19:48, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

↑Jump back a section

Last modified on 1 May 2013, at 19:48