Talk:The Thin Blue Line (film)

(Rated C-class)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.

This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

WikiProject United States / Library of Congress (Rated C-class, Low-importance)

United States portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

C This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Library and information science portal

This article is supported by WikiProject Library of Congress (marked as Low-importance).

WikiProject Library of Congress To-do:

Here are some tasks you can do:

Cleanup: Library of Congress articles needing attention
Geographical coordinates: Library of Congress articles missing geocoordinate data
Infobox: Library of Congress articles needing infoboxes
Stubs: Stub-Class Library of Congress articles
Other:
- Unreferenced: Unreferenced Library of Congress articles
- Place the {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|LOC=Yes|LOC-importance=}} banner into Library of Congress related articles and assess

Text from this version of The Thin Blue Line (film) was copied or moved into James Grigson with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists.

Style?

Shouldn't there be some discussion of the films style? It's got what seems to be a very striking style, particularly the vivid recreations. I think it's also noteworthy that the one scenario the film makers don't show recreated is the one which they believe happened. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.218.221.152 (talk) 02:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

↑Jump back a section

"Awards"

The film was not allowed to be entered into the "Best Documentary Feature" catagory at the Hollywood Academy Awards because of Morris' (restrained) use of "dramatic re-enactments." I'll try to find some citable statement to this effect (it was widely reported at the time, hence my giving it as a flat fact), but I am nowhere near a sizable library, and ask others who are to see if they can come up with something. Thank you. --Ted Watson (talk) 19:46, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

↑Jump back a section

Last modified on 1 September 2012, at 10:33