Talk:Sword replica

(Rated Start-class)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-Class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = <yes/no> \| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3 <!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = <yes/no> \| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

WikiProject Martial arts

(Rated Stub-class)

Martial arts portal

This article is part of the Wikipedia Martial arts Project. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.

WikiProject Fencing

(Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)

Fencing portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fencing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to fencing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Image copyright problem with Image:Chieftain-1.jpg

The image Image:Chieftain-1.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:28, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

↑Jump back a section

Historical copy vs. fantasy creation

This article does not properly differentiate between copies of historical swords and ornamental artwork in the fantasy genre. If anyone could properly sort out the meanings, that would be much appreciated --Anon

↑Jump back a section

This article is only about wallhangers

This article is only about wallhangers, and how far they are removed from acual historical swords. This is ofcourse a nice warning for people wanting to buy a sword replica and looking on wikipedia for some advise. It is however not a good discription of the full range of replicas. This article thus needs reworking and expanding to also cover historically correct replicas. Bobby Siecker —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.83.245.130 (talk) 15:48, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

The article mentions fencing swords, and lists to Albion Swords. It makes clear that if you have USD 1500–3000 to burn you will get much more than a "wallhanger". But that also for USD 500–600 you will get fencing swords that are unsightly but robust. I would claim that the Paul Chen "practical" line is the actual opposite of a "wallhanger", as they are absolutely ugly but can serve in training for years. --dab (𒁳) 12:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

↑Jump back a section

Prices

Are the prices really relevant? If so, are replicas really much cheaper in the US? Osquar F (talk) 12:11, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

I suppose the prices are of interest like for any other commercial product. The ranges given are mere order-of-magnitude figures, so that the difference between USD:EUR (say, 70%–75%) isn't really relevant, but I am sure this can be improved. --dab (𒁳) 12:26, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

↑Jump back a section

Last modified on 20 March 2012, at 21:52