Talk:Suzuki SV650
| WikiProject Motorcycling | (Rated Start-class, Low-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| WikiProject Brands | (Rated Start-class, Low-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Re; 2007 and ABS inclusion. I haven't seen this verified by Suzuki.
- what's up! the ABS is on the suzuki site. please look. its about $800.00 USD more.209.187.72.3 21:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Re: 2007 and Dual Spark Plugs. This does not seem to be mentioned for UK models in any sales documents.
The performance data listed for the K3+ models seem optimistic.
Re: Removal of external links to major SV650 forums. This is uncalled for as they are directly linked to the SV650 community for reliable information on the bike, covering UK/US and other countries.
- communities usually are a good source for basic information, in fact you will see both the good and the bad face up in communities!209.187.72.3 21:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
This page really needs more information - and the tables on the bottom half are not all that helpful. I also replaced the "communty" links. They are a viable source of reliable information. CanyonChaser (talk) 21:48, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Merger with SV650
I can't see why it has been proposed that SV650 merges with Suzuki SV650. The former has no content, and simply redirects to the latter. Hogyn Lleol (talk) 07:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Incidentally, this merger has succeeded. I agree with the idea that these two items should be merged, and no one ought to chase after the aforementioned comment.--Asday85 (talk) 05:45, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Fuel Capacity
Fuel quantity expressed in liters is correct. The gallons value is not. 17L = 4.5 US gal. 16L = 4.2 US gal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.29.43.3 (talk) 22:51, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
This suggestion has been implemented. I can't speak to the veracity of the capacities, but the CONVERSIONS are correct. --Asday85 (talk) 05:48, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
