Talk:Suprnova.org

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified


Suprnova vs. SuprNova edit

i'm making a (half-assed) attempt to standardize the case used in the article for 'Suprnova'. it switches back and forth constantly, even when not used in a domain name (e.g. it might be okay to use "Suprnova.org" and "SuprNova", but shouldn't just switch between "Suprnova" and "SuprNova"). i don't know what is preferable, if there is any rational for one or the other please say so. i am choosing 'Suprnova', mostly just because that's what's used in the article's name. - Shadowsill (talk) 01:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Completely Messed Up - Lock It edit

The article has clearly been changed in favor of suprnova (whatever the hell that is). it should be fixed by someone who knows what they're doing and then locked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.93.177.210 (talk) 18:25, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

dead again edit

since the pirate bay was shutdown 24 Aug 2009, suprnova seems to be dead too. --94.0.156.126 (talk) 00:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Suprnova.org. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply