Talk:Super Mario RPG/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has several issues:

• The lead is too short, and needs to be expanded to summarise the whole article. See WP:LEAD.
• The gameplay section is generally unsourced; only 1 out of 3 paragraphs is sourced
• The story section is just a big mess. A series of bad merges have been done, and the result is a big mishmash of confusing plot information. Needs to be completely rewritten.
• The reception section is too short; there has to be more reviews available for such a famous game.
• Legacy section has a {{fact}} tag in it. Needs a cite.
• The rerelease and rumored sequel section is tagged with a cleanup template. Needs to be addressed.
• The references are badly formatted, and are hard to follow. I also believe there are same unreliable sources used in the article, linke YouTube.

If these issues have not been resolved in one week, I will delist the article of its GA status. The Prince (talk) 16:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

I also feel that the screenshots do not illustrate the game very well. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 19:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

That's true. Forgot to mention that. The Prince (talk) 21:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

One week has passed, and since these issues haven't been resolved, I'm delisting the article. The Prince (talk) 16:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)