Talk:Steffan O'Sullivan
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Gavin.collins in topic Merger Discussion
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merger Discussion edit
This article should be merged with FUDGE as the subject fails notability guideline WP:BIO. --Gavin Collins 09:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
From WP:BIO:
*Creative professionals: scientists, academics, economists, professors, authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, engineers, and other creative professionals.
He is an established author, so let's proceed from there.
- The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.
- The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
Check out Fudge (role-playing game). Specifically, Fudge (role-playing game)#Printed Supplements for the Fudge System. I believe this discounts your notability argument. Turlo Lomon 12:37, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- I also want to add that Bunnies and Burrows is also notable, as proven in that article. This supports the second clause I copied above. Turlo Lomon 15:35, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- As you know, notability is not inherited. This article is too short to demonstrate notability. If the concept, theory or technique was notable, its should follow that there would be a large body of work supporting the claim to notability. I see no evidence of this, although it is always possible that I am mistaken. However, I still propose merger. --Gavin Collins 09:34, 24 September 2007 (UTC)