Talk:SNADS

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Networking

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Comments edit

This seems wrong to me. The redirect page should be removed and this page moved to SNADS. Acronyms and initialisms are almost always presented in all capitals.

People will also often say this isn't an acronym but an initialism.

Requested move edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 11:21, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Snads → SNADS – I agree with the above. IBM uses all caps, as in [1]. SNADS is currently a redirect to Snads that has to be deleted to do the move. Peter Flass (talk) 00:38, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Support. Nearly all the reliable sources on the subject use SNADS. The article should be moved per WP:COMMONNAME.--SGCM (talk) 23:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Support. As stated above it's what IBM and most reliable sources use.--Southronite (talk) 03:41, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Support the only potential issue the WP:MOSTM does not apply since this is an acronym.--70.49.81.140 (talk) 03:24, 25 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic