Talk:Schoenstein Organ at the Conference Center
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Schoenstein Organ at the Conference Center article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
I have removed the Rationale portion of the page with a one sentence description with a link to the page with it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by MoTabChoir01 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 29 September 2009
Merge edit
This article should be merged with the main Conference Center article. Right now the article only consists of a few paragraphs about the organ's origin. Either the article needs to be fleshed out more or it just needs to be merged. Any thoughts? —Mr. Strong Bad/talk 16:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Sounds perfectly fine by me...if you would like to do that, could you? I don't understand that at all. :) MoTabChoir01 (talk) 14:16, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
The article about the organ does not give any explanation of why it is notable enough for its own article. --Nat682 (talk) 18:41, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Additional discussion venue for this merge proposal is at Talk:Conference Center#Merge organ article. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 22:58, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- No, the Organ article should remain separate. There is a lot of technical detail in the Organ article that would be out of place in the Conference Center article.
- --Trappist the monk (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Do not merge. Pipe organs have their own place. Look at articles like Wanamaker Organ, Salt Lake Tabernacle organ and Crystal Cathedral organ. All separate from the host buildings. There's even a Category for Pipe organs. --Manway 21:08, 13 April 2011 (UTC)