Talk:Robert Garran

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Bumbubookworm in topic Work needed
Featured articleRobert Garran is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 16, 2007.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 14, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
May 1, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
May 22, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
August 1, 2020Featured article reviewKept
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 10, 2020, February 10, 2022, and February 10, 2023.
Current status: Featured article

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Robert Garran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Robert Garran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Work needed edit

@Stephen Bain: a checkup of 2007 Featured article promotions reveals that this article is due for an update, to comply with FA standards. There is quite a bit of uncited text, a MOS review is needed (I noticed WP:PUNC, MOS#Captions and WP:DASH, MOS:ALLCAPS), and there are incomplete citations (missing publisher, etc.) Are you (or anyone) able to work on this article to bring it to FA standard so that a Featured article review won't be needed? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • The article has 1c problems because there are at least 25 citations that are by the subject himself Bumbubookworm (talk) 05:37, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply