Talk:Pharmaceutical industry in China

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Wang1663.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Merger proposal

Pharmaceuticals in China article has the same intent as this, but is better laid-out and a bit more coherant. Neither article cite many sources. Certainly don't need two articles unless we're going to make a good split between the Pharma industry and Pharma companies themselves. (mordel 13:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC))

I support this merger. The article seems to have been abandoned by the history so go for it!--BirgitteSB 16:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

I think the merger should take place, as Pharmaceutical companies in China has been tagged for clean up for almost 2 years, and something needs to be done to it very soon. --Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Contribs) 19:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

My only reservation is that neither article have sourced statements, so I can't even begin to understand what's good information or not. I'll try a few small moves to start...--mordel (Talk - Contribs) —Preceding comment was added at 19:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Merger complete: this page could hold useful information at a further date, if someone wishes to do a good business analysis of the industry in China. Top-tens, business trends, important historical dates. Sourced, of course ;-) --mordel (Talk - Contribs) 22:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

This article is not neutral, lacks citation and uses misleading and untrue information. Claims include regulation on par with the US. This page seems to purposefully ignore all of the counterfeit drugs being knowingly and purposefully produced in china and the deadly effects these medications have had. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.208.241.185 (talk) 14:00, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Neutrality and Lack of Citations

This page needs reworking as it is obviously biased to make China's pharmaceutical industry appear more well regulated than it is. It ignores counterfeiting and the deadly effects of China produced medication. Also it uses a lot of vague terms and lacks citation when on claims of increased regulation.

More importantly, however, is the fact that the companies listed under this page are clearly advertising themselves, using loaded words such as "world-class facilities today. Bayer's investment in our integrated production site in the Shanghai Chemical Industry Park makes it evident that Bayer regards Greater China as one of its most important markets worldwide." emphasis on "Bayer's investment in OUR integrated..."... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.232.67.172 (talk) 07:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pharmaceutical industry in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080415200357/http://www.nrcstd.org.cn:80/Magazine/index.php?ChannelID=4&NewsID=574&MagNum=2005-69&KB=1 to http://www.nrcstd.org.cn/Magazine/index.php?ChannelID=4&NewsID=574&MagNum=2005-69&KB=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Companies organization and management - Unsourced

This section has some interesting statistics, but is totally unsourced and I have not been able to locate these stats online anywhere, so I am removing this section until someone can verify the information. Medicalcaremark (talk) 07:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pharmaceutical industry in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928042453/http://www.manufacturing.net/News-China-Could-Be-3rd-Largest-Pharma-Market-By-2011-031610.aspx to http://www.manufacturing.net/News-China-Could-Be-3rd-Largest-Pharma-Market-By-2011-031610.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)