Talk:Patrilineality

This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy). If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biology

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Anthropology

Anthropology portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Merge

Merge. Patrilineage is a stub of a stub and is compatible with this larger article. Lethiere 22:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

↑Jump back a section

History of Medicine

How does that fit into the context of the article? We are speaking about patrilineality and not ancient ideas about conception. --Sven Lotz 11:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

It is clearly relevant. Aristotle's one-seed theory could be used to justify an agnatic theory of relationship, while Galen's two-seed theory fits with a cognatic theory. And Galen lived around the time when Roman law was making the change from one to the other.

If you want the article to be confined to the legal and sociological issue, the part about Y chromosomes and mitochondrial Eve should also go; but once the scientific and medical side is mentioned at all, ancient theories are as relevant as modern, if not more so (as they were a possible influence on ancient institutions). --Sir Myles na Gopaleen (the da) 16:59, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

↑Jump back a section

Agnatic succession

There was a fairly miserable article on Agnatic succession (see old version here). As it was little more than a single sentence definition I've brought it over here as a subheading and redirected the original page. Analysis of how articles reference the topic indicate that many of them point to Patrilinearity anyway. I'm working on improving it here, and I've fixed most of the pages that linked to the aforementioned article Manning (talk) 01:58, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

↑Jump back a section

Last modified on 27 July 2011, at 01:59