Talk:No One Here Gets Out Alive

Untitled

Jim did what he had to do he came he left like jeses jim try to give us a message to wake us up many understand some didn't oh well —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.229.73.3 (talk) 03:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Too Negative?

Sorry, but isn't this article INCREDIBLY hostile towards its subject? I'm not questioning its sources or validity, but there's just nothing else in the entire article, but hostility. It doesn't seem very neutral. I mean, the article on Adolf Hitler manages to be neutral, so this one should be able to be it too ;) 62.107.24.213 (talk) 13:42, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Reliable sources, meaning they meet Wikipedia standards, say Danny Sugerman changed what Paul Rothchild said and what others said. Sugerman even changed what Jim Morrison said. Those were and are serious offenses. How can the Wikipedia article omit them?Brent Brant (talk) 15:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Nah - nope - sorry... this book deserves to be chastened. Poorly written, poorly edited. About a narcissistic alcoholic who drove drunk, verbally abused people, and was undependable throughout his life. Some great music though - and this is not often discussed.

Here are those wacky tildes that Wikipedia says me is who I is... 220.233.10.130 (talk) 06:15, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Doesn't seem unbalanced now. But it lacks any sources whatsoever, and that's bad. After some of the claims made here are cited, then there's a notion of Neutral point of view, that if there is a balance of opinion among reliable sources, those should be represented. --Lexein (talk) 06:23, 18 May 2011 (UTC)