Talk:New Hampshire Route 112

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)


Merge edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep as individual articles. TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 09:13, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Kancamagus Highway → New Hampshire Route 112
  • Regarding the merge request: Nobody calls this road Route 112, not even the locals; everybody calls it Kancamagus Highway. So I would support redirecting New Hampshire Route 112 to Kancamagus Highway, but not the other way around.
Actually, let me amend that, since NH route 112 extends beyond the Kancamagus. For that reason, the two separate articles are perfectly fine; I oppose any merger. The Kancamagus has its own personality and reputation that should not be subsumed into another article. - DavidWBrooks 20:39, 29 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
I also oppose the merger of NH Route 112, and the Kancamagus Hwy. This portion of the route merits its own article because of it's importance to fall foliage watchers, as well as it's federal distinction as a scenic byway. As a person who's driven on the highway, its sheer natural beauty easily distinguishes itself from the other parts of Rt. 112. Wxthewx99 17:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC) 17:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
I oppose the merging of the two articles. The Kancamagus Highway is, although part of NH 112, a separate entity. I didn't even know where NH 112 went west of Lincoln! Keep as two separate articles. JJ 14:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

merge proposal edit

I had put up the merge notice as per Wikipedia:Proposed mergers. Hadn't looked at this talk page, I'd only checked up on the other one. My mistake, thanks for pointing it out. Cheers! - xC - | 13:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New Hampshire Route 112. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply