Talk:Party for Neighbourly Love, Freedom and Diversity
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Party for Neighbourly Love, Freedom and Diversity article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 21 days  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 26 February 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Party for Neighbourly Love, Freedom, and Diversity. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.nos.nl/nos/artikelen/2006/10/art000001C6EBF08CBC0473.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Party for Neighbourly Love, Freedom, and Diversity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060719220314/http://www.pnvd.nl/prog_mei_2006.html to http://pnvd.nl/prog_mei_2006.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:56, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Outdated edit
This Dutch political party was re-established on 7 August 2020,[1][2] with (somewhat) different: board members, logo, party program, and platform.[3] As a result, as of 7 August 2020, this article is out of date. --143.176.30.65 (talk) 11:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- I would not use GeenStijl as a source. They're a notoriously right-wing populist website although the factual information on that article is correct but peppered with slightly insulting terms like "child fuckers". MatryoshkaNL (talk) 17:29, 12 September 2020 (UTC)