Talk:The Morgan Hill Times

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Morgan Hill Times. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714191023/http://secfilings.mcclatchy.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=950008-98-159&CIK=1056087 to http://secfilings.mcclatchy.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=950008-98-159&CIK=1056087

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Notability

This newspaper is not "notable", in fact it is known to produce fake-news and is tea-party republican biased. 50.197.170.139 (talk) 19:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

IPs have repeatedly attempted to PROD this article, and have variously tagged it for Notability, as Original Research, or for only using primary sources. These appear to be invalid. The sources are not original research or only primary, and appear to be sufficient to show notability. There is nothing in the article to support the claim that this is "tea party republican biased" or "fake news", not that either of those would preclude notability of a media outlet even if true. If the IP thinks The Morgan Hill Times is not notable then he or she should take this article to AFD. The IPs are similarly attacking the publisher's bio Dan Pulcrano. Meters (talk) 21:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Fake-News is NOT "Notable" and Morgan Hill Times is a Fake news publisher. 2601:642:4C0A:2706:8D3B:71:87E3:B420 (talk) 20:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

According to whom is this newspaper a fake news publisher? And as I said, even if it were a fake news publisher, there is nothing preventing a fake news publisher from being notable. We have articles on ABCnews.com.co, Denver Guardian and NewsPunch for example.

We get it, you don't like the outlet or its publisher. You have tried PRODDING, tagging for notability, blanking sections claiming typo corrections, tagging for supposed COI issues, etc. I've asked for a block on the latest IP. Continuation of this will lead to more block or page protection requests. Meters (talk) 20:52, 6 June 2022 (UTC)