Talk:Mission: Impossible (1998 video game)

(Redirected from Talk:Mission: Impossible (Nintendo 64))
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Niwi3 in topic GA Review
Good articleMission: Impossible (1998 video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 15, 2018Good article nomineeListed

Box art image edit

Added a box art image for the Nintendo 64 version of the game.

AnubisAscended 04:13, 5 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Delay edit

Wasn't this game seriously delayed?

I think it's the same deal as with other bad movie adaptations like Back to the Future for the NES. --Green Hill (talk) 22:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Release date edit

the video game was released in 1998 on Nintendo 64, I remember that, websites such as MobyGames and on the Google search says that gamew was released in 1998. Egon Eagle (talk) 09:46, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mission: Impossible (1998 video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cognissonance (talk · contribs) 05:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'll take this one. Cognissonance (talk) 05:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Plot edit

  • "by infiltrating the submarine pen and destroying the submarine" Avoid repetition: "by infiltrating the base and destroying the submarine".
  • "steals one half of the CIA non-official cover (NOC) list, a list that gives the real and false names" Avoid repetition and clarify: "steals one half of the CIA non-official cover (NOC) list, which holds the real and false names".
  • "find and save the NOC list" "save" doesn't quite do it, wouldn't "assemble" suffice?
  • "Hunt finds Barnes dead in an office and rescues Parker" Then you can use "save" instead of "rescue" to avoid repetition.

Overall edit

Too few notes to not do myself. Promoted. Cognissonance (talk) 09:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Cognissonance: Thank you for your review and great copy-edits. Niwi3 (talk) 20:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Source edit