Talk:Military reserve force

merge

shouldn't this also be Reserve and National Guard or Reserve and Home Guard with a redirect from Home Guard. They both are similar programs, and i think this would be best as a single article...? they tend to overlap.

also think a title change, hence "move" would be best. Perhaps "Military Reserve and Guard Forces" ? Knowsitallnot 09:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

"National Guard" is a very American term. Unless this page is to be about US National Guards, then I think "Reserve Forces" is appropriate.

I think we can just change the title to Military Reserve and Guard Forces, keep the rest like it is. RHB 23:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Home Guard is a disambig, and contains a mention of a song and will soon contain a mention of some sort of intelligence/spy agency involved in the US civil war. Merging that would be wrong, so I'm pulling the tag from there. -- Akb4 01:32, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Do not merge

Merging reservist with reserve military force is overly simplistic because of the variety of reserve forces. As it is used within the U.S. military, a reservist is routinely a part-time member who may be called upon to activate. Other nations may have completely inactive reserve members (i.e. having no routine commitment) who are called upon to activate (becoming fully active forces). Merging the two would be comparable to merging German under Germany which would only serve to complicate understanding what it means to be an "American of German ancestry" for example. Saseigel (talk) 14:48, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Brazilian Military Police

Does the Brazilian Military Police really qualify? They are the standard "street" police... I remember hearing something about the possibility of calling the police to act as military force in a war, but doesn't that happen in many other places in the world? And I don't see, for example, the RCMP, which acted in the WWII. AFAIK, Brazil doesn't have any force like all those described, but only a military reserve, and the police is the police... -- NIC1138 (talk) 05:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Brazilian Armed Forces doesn't have a separate reserve force, instead, in a case of a call-up, reserve members are incorporated into one of the three forces: Army, Navy or Air Force. A citizen with former military training is usually called up to the same military unit he originally served. Note that every male Brazilian citizen between 18 and 45 is considered a reserve military member, except in some circumstances (poor health, religious convictions, etc.). Also note that Brazil requires every male to enlist in the year they become 18 years old, however, most are dismissed and those who attend college or have a permanent job are not required to serve. It's also important to mention that there wasn't a call-up in Brazil since World War II. 187.59.251.12 (talk) 15:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Military reserve force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080202053753/http://www.soldados.com/reservistas/index.htm to http://www.soldados.com/reservistas/index.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120125005/http://www.reserveforcesparliament.com/ to http://www.reserveforcesparliament.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)