Meta-emotion was nominated as a good article in the category but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Reviewed version: April 30, 2012
|WikiProject Philosophy||(Rated Stub-class)|
The explanation of one of the cells in the Becker section is missing. DCDuring 15:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Mark this article as "need expansion?"
I dont know all the codes for an article, but I think this article needs the note that some newly created or poor written articles has. Not sure what that note says, but it something with "Expansion needed, please help". Please re-write this discission section too for me :p, it's poorly written. Sorry, im not that good with editing wiki articles, but I will learn how to do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 19:10, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Updates to article
I hope that the additions I have made to this article show a marked improvement from what previously existed. I have added much more information and seventeen references to better explain the concept of meta-emotion, particularly parental meta-emotion philosophy. I will continue to work on improving this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acal26 (talk • contribs) 22:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)