Talk:Marcus Ward Lyon Jr./GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 22:42, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

I'll be glad to take this review. In the next few days I'll do a close readthrough, noting here any issues I can't immediately fix myself; once those are addressed, we can go through the criteria checklist. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:42, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Initial readthrough

• "his home state" -- is this his original home state, or Indiana? Perhaps "new home state" would make this clear?

Good catch. Fixed. – Maky ^« talk » 14:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

• Not an issue for GA either way, so feel free to ignore, but as an American, the dates on this should probably be written in month/day/year per WP:STRONGNAT.

Good point... though I wish my country would convert. Putting the day first makes it so much easier to read and write. – Maky ^« talk » 14:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Since both of these concerns border on the trivial, I'm going to go ahead and start the checklist.

Thanks for the review! – Maky ^« talk » 14:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

My pleasure. -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Prose is clear and excellent. Spotchecks show no copyright issues, and issues raised in a previous review have been fixed.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass.

Results?

@Khazar2: I'm kind of confused. Is this a Good Article? It isn't marked as such on the article page. — Brianhe (talk) 00:17, 5 February 2015 (UTC)