Talk:Index of philosophy articles (R–Z)
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Disambiguating "saturation" edit
I am working on disambiguating the term "saturation" and am wondering what to do with the terms "saturated" and "unsaturated" on this page. The best I can come up with related to philosophy is the mathematical logic concept of the saturated model. I think the solution here is to create a red link for "Saturation (philosophy)" if a different meaning is sought. DA3N 17:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Disambiguating "sample" edit
What is a sample, as it relates to philosophy? Right now, this list links to "sample", which is a disambiguation page that doesn't offer a definition for philosophy. Can the link be removed? -- Mikeblas 03:04, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Disambiguating "tone" edit
Similar to the above questions.. what does "tone" mean in a philosophical topic context? I don't see a term on the disambiguation page that seems even remotely appropriate. Can the link be removed? -- Upholder 22:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
There's a discussion on what the reference requirements for lists like this one. The Transhumanist (talk) 01:34, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Expert needed edit
I have requested an expert to look at this article. It contains several links to disambiguation pages that should be solved. An expert should know far quicker where to link to (or when to add additional links) then I do. Your effort will be much appreciated. Night of the Big Wind talk 20:14, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Substratum edit
This page links to Substratum, which presently redirects to Stratum (linguistics) but may in future lead to a disambiguation page. None of the relevant dabs seem to have a link to a philosophy article so I'm not sure how to fix this. Thryduulf (talk) 10:48, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Organised Outline edit
This outline needs to be organised. Rather than just a hodgepodge of hyperlinks, it should be linearly organised, like an actual outline would generally be. Linearly organised vertically and alphabetically ordered. Seriously, what I need to find just took me 3x as longer than if it were actually in a rational format. -SarahTehCat (talk) 03:39, 19 May 2015 (UTC)