Talk:Lineage of Ether

WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement (Rated List-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon
Portal icon Latter-day Saints portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Merge discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result was merge into Lineage of Ether. -- --ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 18:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Affected pages: Jacom, Gilgah, Mahah, Orihah, Emer (Book of Mormon), Heth (Early Jaredite), Heth (Middle Jaredite), Aaron (Jaredite), Amnigaddah, Ahah (Book of Mormon), Ethem, and Ether (Book of Mormon prophet)

It seems to me that there are a lot of LDS stub (that will never be more then that) for the Kings of the Jaredites. Each is only notable for being a Kings of the Jaredites and descendent of Jared and ancestor of Ether. They were easy to combine into a single family tree. Although the new article dose needs work, (like adding Ref tags to the exact Ether verse mentioning the names for those not already tagged) I think they should be merge (with redirects from the old pages to here) like this becuse:

  • The pages contain almost the same wording and structure.
  • This would be a good way to eliminate the stubs and supply all the information.
  • It will give List of Book of Mormon people something to link to besides itself as it currently dose for a large number of the names on this page.

I will do the additional work once I get some feedback here. I don't want to waste my time on something that gets rejected right away.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 15:38, 22 December 2010 (UTC)UTC)

  • No opinion. Do whatever is best. - Gilgamesh (talk) 01:00, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Agree to consolidation. There is no reason I can think of to have separate pages for all of these obscure Jaredite kings. They probably are not notable and not worth having WP articles about, but they could be mentioned in this article with redirects here. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:27, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
  • No opinion. I created a lot of these obscure pages a while back when I was leaning more splittist in my Wikipedia philosophy, but now I really just don't care that much. Be bold and do the merge if you think that is what is best. By the way - you spelled "effected" wrong - it should be "affected" - forgive me for being the grammar nazi. ;) --Descartes1979 (talk) 19:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
↑Jump back a section
Last modified on 4 January 2011, at 18:03