Talk:Letters rogatory
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conventions edit
I'd like to update the section about conventions. Its misleading as very few countries have a process which operates outside a convention. The main convention which covers letters rogatory being the Vienna convention on consular relations, and there ain't many countries that aren't a party to that. See for example http://diaspora.legal/index.php/it/practising-law/back-office/letters-rogatory/ Suastiastu (talk) 13:44, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Letters Rogatory edit
The correct term is "Letters Rogatory" not "Letter Rogatory"Suastiastu (talk) 13:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Service of Process edit
This is a circular definition about jurisdiction. In fact the position is that a Court will have jurisdiction depending upon its own constition and empowerment - the service of its process may be facilitated or permitted in many matters outside its jurisdiction. The assertion is unreferenced. Suastiastu (talk) 13:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)