Talk:Kirkstall Abbey

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Lajmmoore in topic Citations

Citations edit

Leaving these here for future editing: https://brill.com/view/book/9783846747292/BP000020.xml http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/13442/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lajmmoore (talkcontribs) 15:47, 23 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Replacement image edit

Image:Kirkstall Abbey ground plan.GIF is a much better quality image and a suitable replacement for Image:Kirkstall abbey.jpg which is due for deletion. The numbering is different however, but it can be retrieved from http://www.kirkstall.org.uk/abbey/abbeymap.html

I'll sort it out later if no one gets there first. - Papa November 1 08:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Renumbering done. However, there are disagreements between the article and the Kirkstall Abbey abbey page whose link is given above. Most obvious may be the discussion of the collection of rooms to the southeast of the abbey. Unfortunately, I don't know a thing about the design and layout of abbeys in general, or the history of Kirkstall, so I'm afraid I'm unable to fix this. Anyone? --Badger151 03:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Groundplan edit

The issue on the groundplan that I refer to in my edit synopsis is noted above: the numbers in the plan don't always seem to follow the text. Sorry to direct folks here for something I shoud have seen myself on this page --Badger151 02:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Photography edit

The Sweedish site has a good photograph, is there any way of transfering it across to related English articles? Mtaylor848 (talk) 16:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Kirkstall Abbey/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.
  1. Requires inline references adding using one of the {{Cite}} templates
  2. Requires infobox, if suitable one is available
  3. History details could do with expansion
Keith D 20:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 20:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 21:17, 29 April 2016 (UTC)