Talk:Kingdom of Poland (1025–1385)

WikiProject Poland (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon
Portal icon Poland portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Former countries (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 

960s - c.1300 AD - Dukedom of Poland

From its foundation as dukedom in the 960s by Mieszko I accepting ducal title and lien as a fief of the Holy Roman Empire the Dukedom of Poland was ruled by dukes for nearly 340 years till about 1300 AD (exept for a maximum of 12 years when short-term kings ruled the Kingdom/Dukedom of Poland, see Dukedom of Poland, discussion: Dukedom or Kingdom of Poland? In literature it is at times referred to as Kingdom of Poland, even though it was the Dukedom of Poland and only became the Kingdom of Poland by about 1300 AD. An Observer (71.137.197.97 (talk) 21:11, 11 October 2008 (UTC))

↑Jump back a section

Focus

This article should not be confused for a historical article. This article should describe the organization and structure of the former state, as - for example - Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth does. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:48, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

↑Jump back a section

Please do not merge

There is sufficient material on all periods of Poland to have seperate articles. There is no reason to merge any of them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:58, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

↑Jump back a section
Last modified on 24 September 2011, at 02:58