Talk:Kaesong Industrial Region

WikiProject Korea (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
 
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the North Korea working group.

Images

For a wide collection of images of Kaesong, just go to the Wikimedia Commons. Of course, it's anyone's guess whether those are of the KIR or of some other part of Kaesong. And also, this article would need to be substantially expanded before it can support an additional image. -- Visviva 05:33, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

↑Jump back a section

Employees

Will this actually benefit North Korea, or just give wages to the communist party (since all employees are part of the communist party). They should be taking North Koreans from everywhere BUT Pyongyang. --Hurricane Angel 07:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

It would naturally benefit every part: the workers will get higher salary by DPRK standards, the DPRK will acquire much needed foreign currency, while Hundai and others will lower production costs.


It won't benefit anyone since NK is trying to extort any firm stupid enough to invest any money at all in a corrupt Stalinist police state. The whole idea is crashing and burning as this article points out.50.10.99.70 (talk) 23:44, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

↑Jump back a section

Rail transport

From reading Wikipedia, I get the impression that the Pyongbu Line terminates (for practical purposes) at Kaesong Station and that Sonha Station, Pongdong Station and Panmun Station are (for practical purposes) on the Gyeongui Line to South Korea. Can anyone confirm this? Biscuittin (talk) 09:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

↑Jump back a section

No criticism?

Seems unlikely it didnt draw criticism.82.171.225.84 (talk) 21:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Probably such a given for everything to do with NK that it would be redundant to mention it here. 72.28.82.250 (talk) 17:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
↑Jump back a section
Last modified on 3 April 2013, at 17:46