Talk:Task Force East

Conflict of interest

Besides the obvious User:JTF.East, another user with a likely WP:COI is User:Daniel.herrigstad. A Google search for that name shows that a Daniel Herrigstad works in the Public Affairs Office of this group. --Geniac (talk) 02:06, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. Obvious conflict of interest. The article is a PR campaign. No word about the only logical purpose of the bases in the area - future attack on Russia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.200.57.137 (talk) 13:34, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Good work boys! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.225.236.1 (talk) 02:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Move request

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:41, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

• Joint Task Force East → Task Force East – That is the updated name of the initiative. 86.121.18.17 (talk) 23:13, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Presumption.

At each and every turn, in these articles you presume of instances that do not exist. The USoA does not have eastern allies. A) The distance from you to there is almost half a sphere. B) You wouldn´t migrate them to the UsoA, but you would, demand of the rest of europe that they can migrate into europe, and freely so.

You have no allies in eastern europe. At most, western europe has allies in eastern europe, but you, do not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.208.189.225 (talk) 01:50, 24 October 2014 (UTC)