Talk:John Wood (activist)

(Redirected from Talk:John Wood (Room to Read))
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

File:Johnwood.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:Johnwood.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Request for comment edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Does the current title, "John Wood (Room to Read)", meet WP:NCP and WP:AT? If not, what title do you suggest? --George Ho (talk) 21:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

What about John Wood (humanitarian)?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
I'm thinking John Wood (Microsoft) or John Wood (born 1964), but "(humanitarian)" is fine as well. --George Ho (talk) 16:27, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
I'd also support born 1964.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:00, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
I'd go with John Wood (born 1964) as well. He left Microsoft so it doesn't make sense to include Microsoft in the page name. Meatsgains (talk) 00:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
I support John Wood (born 1964). Fraulein451 (talk) 17:40, 6 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
No the title as it is does not meet WP:NCP. Naming conventions seem to say to use parenthetical disambiguation when there is no usual conventional way. Here, because there are other people named John Wood, and John J. Wood, and because he is not commonly identified with his middle name, the parenthetical disambiguation is appropriate. WP:AT leads to the same conclusion. Where the current title seems to fail is "(Room to Read)". The naming conventions specify "Try also to limit the tag to a single, recognizable and highly applicable term." Perhaps it's just me that is not familiar with Room to Read, but I do not find it to be recognizable. Based on the current contents of the article I would suggest   John Wood (literacy advocate), or support   John Wood (humanitarian). I would not support   John Wood (Microsoft) because the article seems to emphasize his work after Microsoft. I would not support   John Wood (born 1964) because the naming conventions state the year of birth is not normally used, and it is not necessary here because it can be resolved with more a specific qualifier. Also the historical figure exception does not apply because there is a dominant qualifier. Becky Sayles (talk) 00:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Not - Here via RfC call. Yes to humanitarian, literacy advocate or my preference: activist. EBY (talk) 01:56, 14 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
I support adding "humanitarian" to the title. Fraulein451 (talk) 01:56, 14 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move the page to John Wood (activist), per the discussion below; if a further move to a different disambiguator is still desired, please initiate a new request. Dekimasuよ! 01:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)Reply


John Wood (Room to Read)John Wood (born 1964) – The current title looks awkward at best. I am thinking "(born 1964)" because I want a very stable title, but there are alternatives, including ones proposed in the previous discussion: "(humanitarian)", "(literacy advocate)", "(advocate)", or "(activist)". "(Microsoft)" is out because he quit the company for something that makes him notable, helping illiterate children worldwide. If renaming is needed but neither title works for you, what is your alternative? George Ho (talk) 18:25, 23 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

John Wood (activist) was my !vote. EBY (talk) 19:08, 23 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment – I am in favor of the parenthetical "activist" as well; if not that, then "literacy advocate", although Room to Read also focuses on gender equality in education so it's not quite as all-encompassing (which is why it's my second choice). --V2Blast (talk) 07:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • I support either "(activist)" or "(born 1964)".--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Fraulein451 supports (humanitarian) (or was it "born 1964"); he mistakenly put his comment in another section. --George Ho (talk) 05:59, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • To clarify I support (humanitarian), much appreciated for inviting me to the discussion George Ho. Fraulein451 (talk) 18:13, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Wood (activist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:51, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply