Talk:John Corbett

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

December Christmas edit

I just saw a made for TV movie (Hallmark Hall of Fame) that he was in. This is not mentioned on his list of movies and I do not know any details about the movie. Just wanted to let his fans know.

“NOVEMBER CHRISTMAS,” A NEW “HALLMARK HALL OF FAME” PRESENTATION STARRING SAM ELLIOTT, JOHN CORBETT,

KAREN ALLEN, SARAH PAULSON AND EMILY ALYN LIND,

HAS STARTED PRODUCTION IN HALIFAX, CANADA

FOR BROADCAST SUNDAY, NOV. 28 ON THE CBS TELEVISION NETWORK

NOVEMBER CHRISTMAS, a new “Hallmark Hall of Fame” presentation starring Emmy Award nominee Sam Elliott (“Buffalo Girls”), Emmy award and Golden Globe award nominee John Corbett (“My Big Fat Greek Wedding,” “Sex and the City”), Karen Allen (“Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull,” “Raiders of the Lost Ark”), Golden Globe award nominee Sarah Paulson (“Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip,” “Deadwood”) and Emily Alyn Lind (“The Secret Life of Bees,” “All My Children”) has started production in Halifax, Canada for broadcast Sunday, Nov. 28 (9:00-11:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network.

http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/07/26/november-christmas-a-new-hallmark-hall-of-fame-movie-starring-same-elliott-premieres-sunday-november-28/58204

john corbett voice edit

is he doing the voice on the applebees commercials —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.4.120.111 (talk) 17:28, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have suspect for years that he does voiceovers for a lot of things. I hear his distinctive voice all the time for this or that. Its nice to confirm that I was correct. --68.118.188.188 (talk) 22:42, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Born again Christian? edit

Can he be a 'born again Christian' while 'living in sin' (as the phrase goes) with a woman? Vauxhall1964 (talk) 22:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Judge not, lest ye be judged. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:19, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I always hated that saying "Judge not, lest ye be judged". Is that supposed to mean that its A-OK to do anything like molest kids and throw Grandma in to the Grand Cannon? I judge plenty. If something is wrong, I am not afraid to say so. For the record, I shack up myself. Go ahead and judge me. I don't care what the Hell you think!!! --68.118.188.188 (talk) 22:45, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Being a Christian does not make you right in everything you do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.79.145.250 (talk) 05:50, 14 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/c 20:41, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply



– The page view numbers say it all:

  • Actor: 32,658
  • Industrialist: 200
  • Cricketer: 48
  • Writer: 236
  • Royal Navy officer: 29
  • Chemist: 41

The other names on the dab page do not exactly match "John Corbett".

With these page view statistics in mind, I think it's clear that the actor is by far the most popular search for "John Corbett" on Wikipedia. He is a pretty clear-cut WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 20:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Question: What about non-exact string matches and long-term significance? WP:DAB is about candidate topics, not exact string matches for article title names, and the presence of an additional name or middle initial in a page name doesn't mean the person isn't known as "John Corbett". Long-term significance should also cause some topics to carry more weight than their page view statistics would seem to indicate. —BarrelProof (talk) 22:42, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Also, I've become even more suspicious of page view statistics after learning that views through redirects are not counted. —BarrelProof (talk) 00:57, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
How would counting redirect views change the equation here? Dohn joe (talk) 01:45, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
I don't know; I haven't checked. As far as I know, no one else has either. —BarrelProof (talk) 03:00, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Tend to oppose Those are small numbers for a TV actor. fails the "John Corbett is" test "John Corbett was" test. Not saying anyone else comes close, but it's a common name. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:49, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Seems to be the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC - by a landslide. That includes adding in the fewer than 450 pageviews over the past month of the other three "John Corbetts" and the album on the dab page. Dohn joe (talk) 01:54, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • I think, when we have no other conclusive evidence, we should go with pageviews, especially with such a disparity as this. We're doing our readers a disservice otherwise. Support Red Slash 21:09, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. No primary topic here. Just recentism. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Obviously meets the usage criterion at WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, so the question is do any of the other John Corbetts have "substantially greater enduring notability and educational value"? Having looked through the article my answer is no and I'd also add neither have the opposers have made a case for the long term significance of one or more John Corbetts either. Jenks24 (talk) 15:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Corbett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply