Talk:Joan Osborne

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Revirvlkodlaku in topic Discrepancy in album numbering

year of birth edit

the [|IMDB] says 1962. What's right?

--afri 10:17, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

They seem to agree now. --Lenoxus 20:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I remember back in the 90s there was a small amount of controversy about her age…she had been promoted as another young female singer/songwriter like Alanis Morissette and she refused to talk about how old she was for a while, then I remember reading an article from later where she said she regretted being secretive about her age and that it was due to pressure from the record label. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.107.186.18 (talk) 22:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Joan osbourne1.jpg edit

 

Image:Joan osbourne1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 17:16, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

`

Sexuality edit

exactly why is her sexualiy an issue worthy of discussion here? Because Philwelch will be on here soon nominating her to be a gay icon.--72.154.193.191 (talk) 17:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree. I am going to remove this section since I can hardly see the relevance to her career. --Jsderwin (talk) 16:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Really? Her sexuality is considerably more relevant to this singer's career than the fact she's had a child...which is included here. Seems the 'de-gaying' of wikipedia continues. Vauxhall1964 (talk) 18:46, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I think it's worth keeping because it contains a quote and not just speculation or a third-party comment. it's really one of the few facts on her personal life in the entry. I would sooner suggest changing the heading to "Personal Life." 12.162.122.6 (talk) 19:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Interview that could be used edit

http://www.philzone.com/interviews/joan/index2.html is an interview of Joan Osborne that could provide information on her. It confirms the birth of her daughter as well. Fridae'§Doom | Talk to me 10:56, 15 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joan Osborne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:13, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Discrepancy in album numbering edit

There is a discrepancy in the way Osborne's studio albums are counted. For example, her 2002 covers album How Sweet It Is is not counted as a studio album, based on the fact that even though it is her third studio-recorded album, her subsequent one, Christmas Means Love, is counted as her fourth (this is not clear, however, as that album doesn't have a separate page), and the next one, Pretty Little Stranger, as her fifth. I realize this could also mean that it is in fact her Christmas album that isn't counted as a studio album, and this would actually make more sense, given that her subsequent covers albums (Breakfast in Bed and Bring It on Home) are categorized as studio albums. In either case, why would either How Sweet It Is or Christmas Means Love not be considered a studio album, since they are neither live albums nor compilations? I'd like to fix this by re-numbering the albums in order to remove the discrepancy. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 00:52, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply