Talk:Jan Gullberg

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Untitled edit

The amazon site quotes the reveiw, i'll need tome to find the accurate citation. DES (talk) 01:06, 18 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The amazon quot from SciAm is:

"The book is an enthusiastic and utterly amazing popularization that promises to be in print for decades.... It is an important reference and a book that is plain fun to dip into. If a family is to have only one mathematics book on the reference shelf, then this is the one."

Scientific American has a "teaser" in this summary of their September 1998 issue. Guess it will do if no one can lay their hands on the actual review. Favonian (talk) 23:39, 18 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jan Gullberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply