Talk:Isotopes of neptunium

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Isotopes of neptunium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110519171204/http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/transport/doc/irsn_sect03_146.pdf to http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/transport/doc/irsn_sect03_146.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/3246/title/Neptunium_Nukes%3F_Little-studied_metal_goes_critical
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Neptunium 219

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269317309942 half-life of 0.15ms (= -0.07 +0.72) This needs adding to the table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.246.147 (talk) 16:11, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Will take a look (and has the gap from 220 to 224 inclusive been filled yet?). Double sharp (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

²³⁴Np: Spin 0+?

That looks impossible as ²³⁴Np is an odd-odd nuclide. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 17:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

³⁴Cl also has 0+ spin. How is it impossible? Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 15:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder. I had always thought that the spin of an odd-odd nuclide can't be zero, as it is stated here: "If the numbers of protons and neutrons are both odd, the ground state nuclear spin is an integer larger than zero" ... 129.104.241.214 (talk) 03:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Ah, I found that ⁵⁰Mn, ⁶⁰Mn, ⁵⁴Co, ⁷⁴Co, ⁶²Ga, ⁶⁴Ga, ⁶⁶Ga, ⁶⁴As, ⁶⁶As, ⁷⁰Br, ⁷⁴Rb, ⁷⁴Rb, ⁷⁸Y, ⁸²Nb, ⁸⁶Tc, ⁹⁰Rh, ⁹⁴Ag, ⁹⁸In, ... also have spin 0+. This includes N = Z nuclides for odd Z = 17 and 25 through 49 (except 29). 129.104.241.214 (talk) 03:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)