Talk:Internet Explorer 1

          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Computing / Software  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
 
WikiProject Internet  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Microsoft (Rated Stub-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Spyglass-Microsoft lawsuit

Some time ago there was an edit war (for example here: [1]) because of the phrase: "However, by including it for free on their OS they did not have to pay royalties to Spyglass Inc., which resulted in a lawsuit and multi-million USD settlement."
At the end, this phrase was removed. But I looked at the Wikipedia page "Microsoft litigation" (in the "Private" section, [2]) and I noticed that it speaks about this fact with a reference. Can I re-insert this phrase in this article with this reference: http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/january/new0122d.htm?
I'm an Italian wikipedian, so sorry for my bad English! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luca Ghio (talkcontribs) 16:21, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I bring back the sentence. THX for the reference. Your English is well. The reference will be added in the IE and the Spyglass article also. mabdul 18:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
I am going to add this to Italian Wikipedia, too. Thank you for reply.--Luca Ghio (talk) 18:14, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
↑Jump back a section
Last modified on 30 October 2011, at 23:52