Talk:Ian Hamilton (British Army officer)

(Redirected from Talk:Ian Standish Monteith Hamilton)
Latest comment: 2 days ago by Montalban in topic Gallipoli campaign - all padding

Constantinople edit

Ladies and Gentleman please do not be obsessed over "Constantinople" because such a thing does not exist.The name o the city is Istanbul and it was Istanbul at the time this battle was fought so i am removing the name "Constantinople".

In English, the city was still referred to as "Constantinople" until the early 1920s, and this is an encyclopaedia in English. You wouldn't refer to Moscow as "Moskva" or Cologne as "Koln".

And at the risk of being pedantic, I have seen it argued that entymologically conSTANtinople and iSTAMbul are actually the same name - it was named after the Emperor Constantine, and Istanbul is the Turkish version of the name. However this theory doesn't seem to be supported by the Istanbul page on here, although said page does still reckon "Istanbul" is a corruption of a Greek name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.192.0.10 (talk) 13:53, 14 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

At the risk of being pedantic myself, may I say there is no such word as "entymologically". There is etymologically, which relates to the study of word derivations, and there is also entomologically, which relates to the study of insects. Your word has a foot in both camps, but means neither thing. Cheers. -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 04:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

it was actually a typo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.159.48.4 (talk) 17:42, 16 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Born in Corfu edit

... which was using the Julian calendar. Are we showing the date after conversion to Gregorian, or is it in Julian, as it would have appeared on his official birth record? -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 12:34, 10 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Galipolli edit

Just one mention of Gallipoli? And now mention of his incompetence as commander at that battle? A few words in the intro are not enough. It is clear a few Revisionist Brits have hijacked this article. Eurocentric anyone?67.68.198.44 (talk) 00:46, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ian Hamilton (British Army officer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

#Later Life edit

The Anglo-German Association mentioned in this section is described on its page as starting in the 1950s--Robert Treat (talk) 01:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Gallipoli campaign - all padding edit

There's a bit about the Gallipoli campaign itself but next to nothing about Hamilton's role, decisions, reason for failure etc.

I think this section is just padding and needs knoweldge of his role added into it (knowledge I don't have so hopefully someone else can put in more relevant information)

Montalban (talk) 04:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply