Talk:Grain elevator

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 74.199.215.110 in topic This is a good article

Headline text edit

I removed two of the harder nob to see pictures of the grain elevators. Please try not to add more of them... the article was becoming a gallery of grain elevators. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 17:09, 20 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Regional Variation edit

Elevators began in Buffalo, New York in the 1840s (I need to double check). They evolved out of flat wherehouses where grain was stored privously. In eastern Canada and the United States, they build small elevators in existing towns, on existing tracks. In western Canada, rail sidings were built every 7 to 7&1/2 miles apart in unsettled land, elevators were then built there and then towns grew up around them. The Railway companies used this power to dictate the settlement patterns and town planning of western Canada. They also dictated to the grain companies how to build their elevators, as so called "standard elevator". This is why western Canadian elevators have distinctive size and shape, all similar to each other but different from other regions. Also I know that completely different methods of grain storage and transport are used in Euorpe and Australia, perhaps there should be a mention of this in the article for comparison's sake. Or a link maybe? I'll get back you with sources on the other info when I can find it. Kevlar67 20:41, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Saskachewan edit

Ares look diffrent but are very common and welll known there more of a tower could we have picture of that?

Difficulty and Danger edit

Can anyone qualify the statement that it is a "problem" to separate regular and genetically-modified corn from one another? I doubt normal farmers care. I bet it is hard to find a place that will guarantee that they will never mix. In the states, I doubt many people care. What exactly is the danger? Political, agricultural? Will they blow up?  ;)

Economic. Farmers can get MUCH higher returns on corn guaranteed not to be GMO. I know the hard science wonks think anti-GMO sentiment is a lot of pseudoscientific hooey believed only by the not-so-bright, but I'm not satisfied that the researchers working on GMO crops even consider for a microsecond the possibility of allergic reactions. Soy proteins being expressed in corn sound irrelevant (if there's a benefit to the modification, of course) unless you have a life-threatening allergy to soy. I suppose too many science wonks dismiss medically proven food allergies as being psychological (often for these people, all health problems they themselves don't experience are psychological in nature), or think people with them are sad, pathetic, objects of pity but it's better that they die in agony than anyone else be even a tiny bit inconvenienced. At least those are the two attitudes I get from the science wonk community, especially since the brazil nut fiasco in which test subjects died. Sad, really. --NellieBly (talk) 06:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Weyburn Inland Terminal edit

I've deleted the statement, The largest grain elevator in North America is the Weyburn Inland Terminal, until a citation can be found to back it up. The Encyclopedia of Saskatchewan doesn't say it's the largest; it seems like if it was, they would say so. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:59, 1 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I know that it was the first farmer Co-op inland terminal in Canada, other than that it is news to me. Kermit C — Preceding unsigned comment added by KermitCrack (talkcontribs) 09:16, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

what is the dangerous part of grain elevators? Why did they blow up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.126.93.201 (talk) 14:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging edit

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 01:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Monopolies edit

The source (Testimony taken by Interstate Commerce Commission, October 15--November 23, 1906, in matter of relations of common carriers to the grain trade, 59th Congress, Senate Document #278, Washington: Government Printing Office, 1907, pg 28, 34-35. (available on print.google)) was taken from Robert Watke an article about a non-notable person I redirected here. It could be used to create a section on grain monopolies in the past. ALXVA (talk) 13:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Grain elevator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:36, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposal edit

Hello, could we add this link to a research article on grain elevators in terms of architectural history? It seems especially relevant as it also opens up the analysis to the situation in Europe whereas the article in its current state is very much, if not completely, about America.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Grain elevator. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Grain elevator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Grain elevator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:16, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grain elevator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

This is a good article edit

You guys are doing good here — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.199.215.110 (talk) 19:46, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply