Posting links to download Ghostzilla edit

I was an early user of Ghostzilla, and I run one of the servers that was an official download for the most recent version of Ghostzilla CD 1.1, before the Ghostzilla web site went down. It appears that the other links are dead, and I would like to post a link to the file, however I don't want to appear self serving (conflict of interest). Is it appropriate to include a link to the server http://www.sachsreport.com/GhostzillaCD-1.0.1-free-v1.zip ? Please let me know if there are any objections under Wikipedia's conflict of interest rule.

There might have been, but I posted it for you, so you're good to go.--Curtis Clark (talk) 03:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Verification of copyright claim edit

Can anyone provide some documentation that Mozilla took action because of copyright infringement? If so, based on what? Building browsers with the Gecko engine has a long tradition, witness Flock, Camino et al. Geira (talk) 11:05, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ghostzilla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:27, 11 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ghostzilla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ninja Browser is still being actively developed edit

Hi Wikipedia! I corrected the bit about Ninja Browser not being around anymore. You can see that it's still in development here:

https://github.com/octalmage/ninja-browser#story

The original Instabrowser link now redirects to this page: https://code.google.com/p/instabrowser

Please let me know if anyone has an issue with this.

Octalmage (talk) 18:53, 23 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

My changes got reverted, so if someone else could please make the change for me I'd appreciate it. I'm not sure if it's necessary that this page mentions that Ninja Browser was dead, it seems more important that it's around now. For evidence that Instabrowser is Ninja Browser, and that Ninja Browser is still around please click the following link:

https://code.google.com/p/instabrowser

When Google Code went down they allowed project owners to specify a new home, which is why you land on the GitHub page for Ninja Browser.

Thanks! Octalmage (talk) 02:31, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

To be clear, I am the original author of Instabrowser and Ninja Browser.

Octalmage (talk) 02:32, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply